Kant's Theory of Knowledge and its Inherent Contradiction: examining the Kant's theory of knowledge based on Kant's own criterion in formation of knowledge

Aslani, Mohammad

doi:10.22034/jpiut.2022.50366.3120

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Mohammad Aslani

Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies Department, Razi University, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.50366.3120

Abstract

In his theory of knowledge, Kant presents an exclusive method for obtaining science by applying categories to the data of sensory intuition. "A priori synthetic propositions" are those the only the product of the application of categories to the data of sensory intuition, Propositions that are Kant's exclusive criterion in diagnosing science. Kant claims that only the sciences that have a priori synthetic propositions, which necessarily have sensory intuition data are science, and propositions that do not have sensual intuition data are nothing more than fake science. With the same reasoning, he pushed metaphysics out of science. Accordingly, the attempt of this paper is to measure Kant's theory of knowledge with his own criterion of knowledge. We want to know whether it has a priori synthetic propositions or not. To be more precise, do the propositions through which Kant explained his theory of knowledge, contain sensory intuition data or not? If they have these data, they are science, otherwise, they are not. The investigations carried out in this article, which focuses on Kant's important and key propositions in transcendental aesthetic and Transcendental analytic, show that these propositions, which define and explain the basis of Kant's theory of knowledge, lack sensory intuition data and are not science. Eventually, Kant's "theory of knowledge" is not able to obtain the accreditation it wants and according to Kant's own theory of knowledge, it is not a valid science.

Keywords

Main Subjects

epistemology

References

Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, H. (1973). The Origins of Totalitarianism, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

Arendt, H. (2005). The Promise of Politics, edition & introduction by J. Kohn, Schocken

Asghari, M. (2012). The primary of ethics upon philosophy, Journal of Philosophical Investigations (University of Tabriz). 6(10), 34-41. (In Persian)

Bashiriyeh, H. (2017). Revival of political science, Ney Publication. (In Persian)

Cederberg, C. (2010). Resaying the human: Levinas beyond humanism and antihumanism. Södertörns högskola,

Critchley, S. (2014). Ethics of deconstruction: Edinburgh University Press.

Dossa, S. (1989). The public realm and the public self: The political theory of Hannah Arendt, Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.

Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison (trans. Sheridan, A.) Harmondsworth.

Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Trans. By R. Α Cohen. Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (1989). Ethics and politics. The Levinas Reader, pp. 289-297.

Levinas, E. (1996). Beyond the State in the State. New Talmudic Readings, pp. 79-107.

Levinas, E. (1998). Entre nous: On thinking-of-the-other, Columbia university press.

Levinas, E. (1999). Alterity and Transcendence, translated by M. B. Smith (Columbia.

Mesbahian, H. & Norris, T. (2017). Dieter Misgeld: A philosopher’s journey from hermeneutics to emancipatory politics, Springer.

Mesbahian, H. (2010). Modernity and its Other: The Logic of Inclusive Exclusion Falsafeh, (Journal of Philosophy) University of Tehran. 38)1(, 165.190

Mesbahian, H. (2019). Reinventing the Self: A Philosophical Encounter with the Historiography of Cultural Identity. Historical Perspective & Historiography, 29(23), 255-274.

Mesbahian, H. (2020). Ethical Politics From Theory to Practice: On the Possibility of an Ethical Politics through Levinas' Philosophy and Mossadegh’s Experience, Journal of Theoretical Politics 28(15), 1-34. (In Persian)

Mesbahian, H. (2020). Habermas and the Other of Occidental Rationality: The Dichotomous Logic of Exclusive Inclusion. University of Tehran, The Iranian Journal of Philosophy, 47(2), 145-165. (In Persian)

Misgeld, D.; Norris, T. & Mesbahian, H. (2010). A philosopher's journey from hermeneutics to emancipatory politics. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 19(2), 86-97.

Schmitt, C. (2008). The Concept of the Political, translated by S. Najafi, in law and violence (edited by morad farhadpour, omid mehregan, saleh najafi), Frahange Saba (In Persian).

Strauss, L. (2017). An Introduction to Political Philosophy, translated by Y. Jeyrani, Agah Publication. (In Persian)

Taylor, C. (2005). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, K. & Embree, L. (2000). Phenomenology of the Political, (Vol. 38): Springer Science & Business Media.

Topolski, A. (2015). Arendt, Levinas and a politics of relationality, Rowman & Littlefield International.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Kant's Theory of Knowledge and its Inherent Contradiction: examining the Kant's theory of knowledge based on Kant's own criterion in formation of knowledge

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 17, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43
articles
Vol. 17, Issue 43, Summer 2023
August 2023
Pages 299-319

Kant's Theory of Knowledge and its Inherent Contradiction: examining the Kant's theory of knowledge based on Kant's own criterion in formation of knowledge

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 17, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43 articlesVol. 17, Issue 43, Summer 2023August 2023Pages 299-319

Volume 17, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43
articles
Vol. 17, Issue 43, Summer 2023
August 2023
Pages 299-319