Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Payame Noor University

Abstract

In Wittgenstein’s view, religious beliefs use an image; they are commitments which are unshakably everlasting and have the potentiality to give order to whole life. It is hardly based on evidence. Accordingly, they neither receive any assistance from science or philosophy nor receive any damage from them. Nowadays you may observe priests including Don Kyvpyt who are not realists. This observations stands in sharp contrast with what is held in religious societies. They even contradict with scientific and religious realities which hold religion as a set of images of reality. As Wittgenstein argues to be the case, religious propositions are pieces of evidence about which objective realities are not taken to be very true. These statements are not supposed to refer to anything, rather they are assumed to play a significant role in human religious life.

Keywords

Churchill. y. July, (1989), "Wittgenstein's lectures on Religious Belief" part 1, Sophia. vol. 20. 2, 23-35.
Dummet, Michael, (1993), Origins of Analytic Philosophy, Geraid Duckworthand Co Ltd.
Kenny, Anthony, (Ed), (1994), The wittgenstine Reader, Oxford: Black well.
Stiver, DanR. (1996), The philosophy of Religious Language, Sign, Symbol, and Story, Oxford: Black well publishets.
O Grady, Paul, (2004), ''wittgenstein and Relativism'' in International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol. 13 (3), 315-337.
Rhees, Rush, (1984), Ludwig. Wittgenstein: personal Recolections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Winch, peter, (1972), Understanding a primitire society, in Ethics and Action, London.
Wittgenestein, ludwing, (1960), The blue and Brown books. Tr. Rhees Rush. Black well.
CAPTCHA Image