A Comparative Study of the Epistemological Origin of Philosophical concepts from the perspective of Hume and Allameh Tabatabai

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate of Islamic Theology and Philosophy Department, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Islamic Theology and Philosophy Department, Shabestar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Islamic Theology and Philosophy Department, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

Abstract

The review of the works and the writings of philosophers regarding the origin of philosophical concepts and the origin of the concepts and imaginations before it are indicative of the gradual and influenced formation and importance of this issue from a series of ideas in both the west and Islam. In the western world, the idea of innate ideas raised by rationalists and the rejection of the same idea by empiricists finally leads the Scottish philosopher Hume, who is evasive from the mysterious philosophy,to tract the origin of concepts and adaptations and by presenting a plan to refer concepts and adaptations has beaten all philosophies and introduced them as illusory and invalid concepts,and appeals to justifying the existence of these concepts in the mind to psychological and imaginary bases. later and in the passing of time due to the entry of western ideas into Iran,especially in the contemporary era,the issue of the origin of concepts and ideas (in general) and the origin of philosophical(in particular) by Allamh Tabatabayi has doubled its value and importance. Allameh, like Hume while rejecting the idea of innate and preconceived notions of the mind and bringing science to the field of presence and emphasizing the inherent existence and discovery of science and by reference all concepts and ideas to present science the validity and epistemological value of the philosophical concepts which are in Hume's philosophical dictionary restores what was disappeared and gives new life to philosophy and its concepts. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Allameh Helli, H. (1992). Kashfolmorad Almorad fi Sharheltajrid ol Eteghad. Islamic Publishing Institute. (In Persian)
Bailey, A. & O'Brien, D. (2006) Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Continuum International Publishing Group.
Broughton, J. (2006). Impressions and Ideas. The Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise, Edited by Saul Traiger. Blackwell Publishing.
Copleston, F. C. (1996). History of Philosophy, Translated by A. J. Alam, Soroush. )In Persian)
Fanai Ashkuri, M. (1992). Secondary Intelligibles, Imam Khomeini Educational Research Institute. (In Persian)
Farabi, A. N. (1986). Alhoroof, Dar ul-Sharq. (In Persian)
Garrett, D. (2005). Hume, The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Craig, Routledge.
Ghoshchi, A. (2003). Sharh ol-Tajrid ol-Eteghad, Corrected by M. H. Zarei Raed. (In Persian)
Hakak, S. M. (2001). Research in Hume's Epistemic Opinions, Meshkat. (In Persian)
Haugeland, J. (1998). Having Thought: essays in the metaphysics of mind, Harvard University Press.
Hume, D. (1921). An Enguiry concerning Human Understanding, Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1965). Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford University Press.
Ibn Sina, A. (1997). Al-Shifa (Theology), The School of the Great Ayatollah Al-Marashi Al-Najafi. (In Persian)
Ismaili, M. (2010). A Second Philosophical Reason in Islamic Philosophy, Imam Khomeini Educational Research Institute. (In Persian)
Leibniz, G. W. (1996). Monadology, Translated by Y. Mahdavi, Kharazmi. (in Persian)
Malekian, M. (2000). History of western philosophy, Vol. 3. Research School and University. (In Persian)
Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (1984). Commentary on Nahayat Al-Hikmah, Fi al-Tariq al-Haq Institute. (In Persian)
Mir Damad, M. B. (2002). Al-Ayman Calendar, Institute of Islamic Studies. (In Persian)
Motahhari, M. (2010). Collection of Works, Sadra. (In Persian)
Maggie, B. (1998). The Great Philosophers, Translated by E. Foulavand, Kharazmi. (In Persian)
Rene, D. (2016). Meditations on the First Philosophy. Translated by A. Ahmadi. 13th edition. Samat. (In Persian)
Russell, B. (1994). History of Western Philosophy. Translated by N. Daryabandari. Paravaz. (In Persian)
Sadruddin Shirazi, M. (1981). Al-Hikma al-Mu'ta'iyyah fel -Asfar al-Aqliyyah al-Arba'ah, Dar al-Ehya ol-Toras.
Spinoza, B. (. 2009). Ethics, Translated by Mohsen Jahangiri. 3rd edition, University Publishing Center. (In Persian)
Stround, B. (2003). Hume, Edited publish, Taylor & francisee-library.
Suhravardi, S. (2017). Collection of Works of Sheikh. Vol. 1, Hikmat and Philosophy Association. (In Persian)
Swain, C. G. (2006). Personal Identity and the Skeptical System of Philosophy, The Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise, edited by S. Traiger, Blackwell Publishing.
Tabatabaei, M. H. (1983). Nahayat Al-Hikmah. Islamic Publishing Institute. (In Persian)
Tabatabaei, M. H. (1990). Man from beginning to end. Translated by S. Amoli Larijani. Al-Zahra. (In Persian)
Tabatabaei, M. H. (2010). Principles of Realism Philosophy and Methods. Introduction and footnotes by M. Motahari. Vols 1, 2, 3. Sadra. (In Persian)
Tabatabaei, M. H.) 2006). Bedayat al-Hikmah. Translated by M. Ghoruyan, Dar al-Fekr. (In Persian)
Wahl, J. (2001). Discussion in Metaphysics. Translated by Y. Mahdavi, Kharazmi. (In Persian)
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics