Kant’s Humanism: A Loophole in the Principle of Sufficient Reason

Dal Monte, Daniel

doi:10.22034/jpiut.2024.62265.3800

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Daniel Dal Monte

Professor of Philosophy, Rowan University, United States

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2024.62265.3800

Abstract

I consider the principle of sufficient reason (henceforth, PSR) as it functions in both Leibniz and Kant. The issue separating these thinkers is a modal status of absolute contingency, which is exempt from PSR insofar as it is neither logically necessary, nor does it necessarily follow from the given causal series. Leibniz’s ambitious metaphysics applies PSR even to God’s choices, which, since they must rest on a reason that makes sense of them, necessarily tend to the creation of the best of all possible worlds. Through PSR, the exercise of human freedom represents the unfolding of a concept God already has chosen, with an eye to the best possible world aligned with the universal intelligibility enjoined by PSR. PSR, in Kant’s critical period, is not a principle of being, but one of mere experience, since any extension of thought beyond possible experience can yield no knowledge. Human agency, for Kant, has an intelligible aspect that is beyond possible experience. Since PSR is only a principle of experience for Kant, the agent in its intelligible aspect is not subject to it. Human free will introduces a special modal category of absolute contingency. Kant provides impetus for a humanism that makes the absolute freedom of the human will a competitor with the sovereignty of God, and also liberates the human will from contemporary ideologies that would subordinate it to natural determinism or group dynamics.

Keywords

Main Subjects

philosophy

References

Adams, R. (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford University Press.

Allison, H. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press.

Aristotle. (1984). Categories. In Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume I: Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by J. Barnes & translated by J. L. Ackrill. Princeton University Press.

Daniel M. W. (2002). The Illusion of Conscious Will, MIT Press.

De Boer, K. (2020). Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press.

De Jung, J. E. (2013). The Modesty of Kant’s Metaphysics. In Kant und Die Philosophie in Weltbürger Absicht: Akten des XI. Kant Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter, Pgs. 553-562.

Descartes, R. (1964-1976). Oeuvres de Descartes, Vol. I. Edited by P. Tannery & C. Adam. Vrin-C.N.R.S.

Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method, trans. by W.D. Halls & Edited by S. Lukes, The Free Press.

Kant, I. (1996). A New Elucidation of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition. Theoretical Philosophy: 1755-1770. Edited and translated by D. Walford & R. Meerbote. Cambridge University Press,

Kant, I. (1996). Critique of Practical Reason. In Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by P. Guyer & A. Wood. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of Judgment. Edited and translated by P. Guyer & E. Matthews. Cambridge University Press.

Leibniz, G.W. (1952). Theodicy. Edited by A. Farrer & translated by E.M. Huggard. Yale University Press.

Leibniz, G.W. (1965). Monadology and Other Philosophical Essays. Translated by P. Schrecker & A. Martin Schrecker. Library of the Liberal Arts.

Leibniz, G.W. (1969). Philosophical Papers and Letters. Edited by L. L. Loemker. Reidel.

Leibniz, G.W. (1981). New Essays on Human Understanding. Edited & translated by P. Remnant & J. Bennett. Cambridge University Press.

Leibniz, G.W. (1988). Discourse on Metaphysics and Related Writings. Edited and translated by R. N. D. Martin & S. Brown. Manchester University Press.

Lovejoy, A. (1936). The Great Chain of Being. Harvard University Press.

Nieman, S. (1994). The Unity of Reason, Oxford University Press.

Pereboom, D. & McKenna, M. (2016). Free Will: A Contemporary Introduction, Taylor & Francis.

Sapolsky, R. M. (2023). Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will, Penguin.

Spinoza, B. (2018). Ethics. Edited and translated by M. J. Kisner & M. Silverthorne. Cambridge University Press.

Stang, N. (2016). Kant’s Modal Metaphysics, Oxford University Press.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Kant’s Humanism: A Loophole in the Principle of Sufficient Reason

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 18, Issue 47 - Serial Number 47
articles
Special issue: Kant's Philosophy in the 21st Century
August 2024
Pages 29-48

Kant’s Humanism: A Loophole in the Principle of Sufficient Reason

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 18, Issue 47 - Serial Number 47 articlesSpecial issue: Kant's Philosophy in the 21st CenturyAugust 2024Pages 29-48

Volume 18, Issue 47 - Serial Number 47
articles
Special issue: Kant's Philosophy in the 21st Century
August 2024
Pages 29-48