Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• ali salmani ¹
• sepehr salimi ²

¹ associate professor of philosophy of art. art and architecture faculty. Bu Ali Sina university. Hamedan. Iran

² PhD. candidate of philosophy of Art, Graphics. Bu-Ali University. Faculty of Art and Architecture. Hamedan. Iran

Abstract

Kant is known as the pioneer of the artistic formalism. Art critics and commentators of Kant's works have also confirmed this claim. Kant discusses the form first in the critique of pure reason and then in the third moment of the critique of the power of judgment. According to Kant, what is universal in the judgment of the beauty and could be expected from all people is the form. Unlike the form, the sensory perception of an object varies depending on the perceptual ability of people. Roger Fry and Clive Bell, as formalist critics and artists, put forward Kant's concept of form in the 20th century and by emphasizing it as the only act of beautifying works of art in the modern era, played an irreplaceable role in the expansion and development of Kant's view on the concept of form of modern art. This article aims to investigate the relationship between this concept in the thought of formalists and in Kant's aesthetics. It was determined by the conducted investigations that, although formalists consider form to be a kind of temporal-spatial arrangement of the sensous intuitive manifolds, in terms of their emphasis on the emotional expression of form in contrast to Kant's emphasis on the purposiveness without purpose of the form and the creation of the free harmony of imagination and understanding, causes a great difference between Kant's thought and Fry and Bell's formalist thought.

Keywords

• Formalism
• Kant
• Clive Bell
• Roger Fry
• Aesthetic Ideas

Main Subjects

• epistemology