Absolute Freedom in Anglophone Hegel Interpretation, and Its Implications for Technological Utopianism

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Philosophy and World Religions, Rowan University, USA

Abstract

Contemporary Hegel scholarship either defends a theological metaphysics in which history is a teleological unfolding of cosmic Geist; or, the evolution of Geist represents the absolutization of human subjectivity, which undergoes a Bildung that prescinds from any reliance on metaphysical givens. The dilemma is between presenting Hegel as an absolute monist that is outmoded in light of modernity’s skepticism towards a teleology of history; or, of reducing Hegel to the terms of modernity, as defending the absolute self-grounding of the human subject, in history without ontology. I argue that co-opting Hegel for modernity is a mistake. The post-Kantian interpretation of Hegel, that rejects any metaphysics of the absolute, leaves the human subject in a state of alienation that the dialectic process in Hegel is supposed to resolve. I argue that PKI’s account of the self-grounding subject is too similar to absolute freedom that Hegel views as a dangerous fruit of the Enlightenment. Absolute freedom, having relegated God to deistic irrelevance, and stripped nature of any telos, seeks to make its own categories sovereign over those of reality.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Gardner, S. (2007). The limits of naturalism and the metaphysics of German idealism. In E. Hammer (Ed.), German idealism: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 19-49). Routledge.
Hammer, E. (2011). Philosophy and temporality from Kant to critical theory. Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1974). Aphorismen aus der Jenenser Zeit, no. 31. In Dokumente zu Hegels Entwicklung (p. 360). Frommann.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.; J. N. Findlay, Notes and Commentary). Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Hegel's philosophy of nature: Being part two of the Encyclopaedia of the philosophical sciences (1830) (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Clarendon Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the philosophy of right (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Margolis, J. (1993). The definition of the human. In R. Pryba (Ed.), The critical Margolis (pp. 263-288). State University of New York Press.
Margolis, J. (2021). Reclaiming naturalism. In R. Pryba (Ed.), The critical Margolis (pp. 97-146). State University of New York Press.
Pink, T. (2011). Will. In H. Lagerlund (Ed.), Encyclopedia of medieval philosophy (pp. 1387–1390). Springer.
Pinkard, T. (1994). Hegel's phenomenology: The sociality of reason. Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. B. (1989). Hegel’s idealism: The satisfactions of self-consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. Cambridge University Press.
Vieira, F. (2010). The concept of utopia. In G. Claeys (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to utopian literature (pp. 3–27). Cambridge University Press.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Volume 19, Issue 53 - Serial Number 53
Articles
Issue 53, Winter 2026
December 2025
Pages 177-194

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics