Knowledge without a Subject: a philosophical reflection on the epistemic legitimacy of the machine

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Sa.C., Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract

The transformation of cognitive and ethical structures in the age of artificial intelligence confronts philosophy with a fundamental question: how does knowledge emerge, and where does responsibility reside when decision-making moves beyond the sphere of human consciousness into algorithmic networks? Focusing on the concept of subjectless knowledge, this study argues that intelligent systems have shifted knowledge from a mental capacity to a mediating process in which human agents, data, and algorithms jointly participate in the production of meaning. Employing a reflective-analytical methodology and examining cases in medicine, media, and law, the paper contends that epistemic validity in the digital era is no longer measured solely by truth, but by the transparency of processes, the capacity for explanation, and the possibility of accountability. Within this framework, social epistemology elucidates how belief is shaped in algorithmic environments, while the ethics of responsibility provides a structure through which the contribution of both human and machinic agents to outcomes can be traced. The proposed model integrates these two dimensions, conceiving knowledge as a mediating event where meaning arises through the interaction between human interpretation and computational reasoning. Accordingly, moral responsibility becomes a distributed property of a network in which every agent participates in the unfolding of cognition. This analysis suggests that maintaining epistemic and ethical legitimacy in intelligent systems requires a philosophical reorientation-from the individual subject toward the distributed architectures of knowing.

Graphical Abstract

Knowledge without a Subject: a philosophical reflection on the epistemic legitimacy of the machine

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abràmoff, M. D., Lavin, P. T., Birch, M., Shah, N., & Folk, J. C. (2018). Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. NPJ Digital Medicine, 1(1), 39.
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2022). Machine bias. In Ethics of data and analytics (pp. 254–264). Auerbach Publications.
Aristotle. (1994). Posterior Analytics (J. Barnes, Ed.). In The Complete Works of Aristotle (Vol. 1). Oxford: University of Oxford; Balliol College.
Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean Ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blanshard, B. (1939/2014). The nature of thought: Volume I. London: Routledge.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. OUP Oxford.‏
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. oxford university Press.‏
Derrida, J. (1995). The gift of death. University of Chicago Press.‏
Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on first philosophy (J. Cottingham, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eubanks, V. (2025). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Macmillan+ ORM.‏
Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (2013). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.‏
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans., Rev. ed.). London: Continuum.
Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. harvard university Press.‏
Goldman, A. I. (2010). Why social epistemology is real epistemology. Na.‏
Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms: An author's reflections. Denv. UL Rev., 76, 937.‏
Hedlund, M., & Persson, E. (2025). Distribution of responsibility for AI development: expert views. AI & SOCIETY, 1-13.‏
Heidegger, M. (1962/2001). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In Technology and values: Essential readings (pp. 99–113). New York: Harper.
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.‏
James, W. (1975). Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.‏
Johnson, D. G. (2015). Technology with no human responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 127(4), 707-715.‏
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago press.‏
Kant, I. (1998/1999). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lipton, Z. C. (2018). The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue, 16(3), 31-57.‏
Longino, H. E. (2019). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry.‏
Mill, J. S. (1998). Utilitarianism (R. Crisp, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, G. E. (1953/2014). Some main problems of philosophy. London: Routledge.
O'neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.‏
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. penguin UK.‏
Plato. (2008). Theaetetus (S. Asscher & D. Widger, Eds.). Project Gutenberg. Retrieved from https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1726
Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 48(1), 137-141.‏
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice, Harvard. Press, Cambridge.‏
Sartre, J. P. (1943/2003). Being and nothingness (H. Barnes, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Sartre, J. P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media.‏
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. John Wiley & Sons.‏
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Volume 20, Issue 55 - Serial Number 55
Articles
Issue 55, Summer 2026
July 2026
Pages 541-560

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics