Pyrrhonian Skepticism: the perpetual quest for truth or the everlasting suspension of judgment? (toward a solution to the problem of inquiry in sextus empiricus)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate . Department of Philosophy, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

This paper investigates a tension in PH I.1–2 and 28–29. In the first passage, the Pyrrhonian skeptic is portrayed as one who “continues” inquiry in pursuit of truth; in the latter, however, he is said to abandon inquiry unexpectedly upon arriving at an unforeseen endpoint: epoché (suspension of judgment) together with its accompanying state of ataraxia (tranquility). At first glance, these accounts seem to imply that the Pyrrhonist both persists in endless inquiry and yet brings inquiry to a halt once tranquility is achieved. Some scholars maintain that Pyrrhonian inquiry is not a form of philosophical investigation in the ordinary sense: its aim is not truth but tranquility, and the skeptic therefore abandons the pursuit of truth once suspension of judgment seems sufficient for peace of mind. Others, by contrast, argue that the inquiry must remain truth-directed, since without such an orientation suspension of judgment would lose its significance and tranquility could not be attained. We argue that the ataraxia accompanying suspension of judgment is not identical to the tranquility originally sought by the Pyrrhonist. The alleged tension, therefore, stems from a conflation of two distinct senses of ataraxia.

Graphical Abstract

Pyrrhonian Skepticism: the perpetual quest for truth or the everlasting suspension of judgment? (toward a solution to the problem of inquiry in sextus empiricus)

Keywords

Main Subjects


Annas, J. & Barnes, J. (1985), The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations, Cambridge University Press.
Annas, J., and J. Barnes (2000), Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, second edition.
Bailey, A. (2002), Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonian Scepticism, Oxford University Press
Barnes, J. (1990), The Toils of Scepticism, Cambridge University Press.
Bowden, Ch. (2024), Inquiry, value, and some peculiarities in Pyrrhonist’s psycholog. Synthese, 203:175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04601-3
Brennan, T. (1999), Ethics and Epistemology in Sextus Empiricus, Routledge
Brochard, V. (1899), Les Sceptiques Grecs, Paris: Imprimerie nationale
Bury, R.G., trans. (1939–49) Sextus Empiricus (Loeb Classical Library), 4 volumes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Castagnoli, L. (2018), Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge University Press.
Catapano, M. (2017), The Two Modes of Scepticism and the Aporetic Structure of Foundationalism. Méthexis 29(1), pp. 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-02901006
Corti, L. (2005). Scepticisme et Langage, Vrin.
Dunphy, R. (2022). From Proto-Sceptic to Sceptic in Sextus’ Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 55 (3), 455-484.
Eichorn, R. (2020). Sextus Empiricus on Isotheneia and Epoche: A Developmental Model. Sképsis: Revista de Filosofia 21(11), 188-209.
Floridi, L. (2002). Sextus Empiricus: the transmission and recovery of pyrrhonism. American classical Studies, Vol. 46. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, J. (2013). Question‐directed attitudes. Philosophical Perspectives 27(1), 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12026
Friedman, J. (2017). Why Suspend Judging? Nous 51(2): 302-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12137
Grgić, F. (2012). Investigative and Suspensive Scepticism. European Journal of Philosophy 22(4), 653-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00521.x
Hankinson, R. J. (1998). The Sceptics, Routledge.
Hankinson, R. J. (2020). The Sceptical Inquirer. History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 23(1), 74-99.
James M. (trans.) (2018), Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Oxford University Press.
Machuca, D. (2021). Can the Skeptic Search for Truth? Elenchus, 42(2), 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0017
Naess, A. (1968). Scepticism, Routledge.
Palmer, J. A. (2000). Sceptical Investigation. Ancient Philosophy 20(2), 351-375. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200020234
Pellegrin, P. (1997). Esquisses Pyrrhoniennes, Édition du Seuil.
Perin, C. (2020). Tranquillity as the goal in Pyrrhonian Skepticism. The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, Edited by Kelly Arenson, Routledge.
Polito, R. (2007). Was Skepticism a Philosophy? Reception, Self‐Definition, Internal Conflicts. Classical Philology 102(4). pp.333-362. https://doi.org/10.1086/588504
Ribeiro, B. C. (2021). Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers, Brill.
Sienkiewicz, S. (2019). Five Modes of Scepticism: Sextus Empiricus and the Agrippan Modes, Oxford University Press.
Smith, P. J. (2022). Sextus Empiricus’ Neo-Pyrrhonism, Springer.
Striker, G. (1996). On the Difference Between Pyrrhonists and Academics. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge University Press.
Striker, G. (2022). Scepticism as a Kind of Philosophy. From Aristotle to Cicero: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, OUP. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.83.2.113
Svavarsson, S. H. (2021). Disturbance in the Outlines of Sextus Empiricus. Phronesis 66 (4), 402-425. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10046
Svavarsson, S. H. (2024). Investigation and Tranquillity in Sextus Empiricus. Phronesis 69(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-bja10079
Vlasits, J. (2025). Sextus Empiricus on Inquiry and Suspension of Judgment. Suspension in Epistemology and Beyond, Routledge.
Vogt, K. M. (2010). Scepticism and action. The Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Richard Bett (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
CAPTCHA Image