The lack of the experimental evidence and doing of the similar examinations” are two reasons for some experimental scientists to state that the causality principle is not valid at the atomic limit. In this paper these two reasons are investigated and we show that if the causality or the rational rules are ignored for solving the problem which we faced with (i.e. according to rationality rules we believe that the causality principle is valid at the atomic limit, and on the other hand, we have not found any experimental evidence for this principle) then the process of inquiry would be stopped. But if we reject the other cases, we don’t have this problem.
EINOLLAHZADE SAMADI, A. (2010). Investigation of two reasons about the lack of comprehensiveness of Causality principle. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 3(214), 71-87.
MLA
EINOLLAHZADE SAMADI, A. . "Investigation of two reasons about the lack of comprehensiveness of Causality principle", Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 3, 214, 2010, 71-87.
HARVARD
EINOLLAHZADE SAMADI, A. (2010). 'Investigation of two reasons about the lack of comprehensiveness of Causality principle', Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 3(214), pp. 71-87.
CHICAGO
A. EINOLLAHZADE SAMADI, "Investigation of two reasons about the lack of comprehensiveness of Causality principle," Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 3 214 (2010): 71-87,
VANCOUVER
EINOLLAHZADE SAMADI, A. Investigation of two reasons about the lack of comprehensiveness of Causality principle. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 2010; 3(214): 71-87.
)
Send comment about this article