Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Assosiate Professor in philosophy, Payam-e Nour University
Abstract
In this paper, first we attempt to explain the concept of paternalism from the standpoint of political philosophy. Then, restricting debate to epistemology, we will show that paternalism is based on an epistemic claim. Also, we will distinguish certain kind of paternalism as epistemic paternalism, and then will study the manners of actualization and justification of this kind of paternalism. Finally, the view is defend that the epistemic paternalism because of its valuable epistemic consequences will be legitimate if it construct on some certain criterions without postulating epistemic superiority of some people, and if it is accomplished by experts.
In this paper, first we attempt to explain the concept of paternalism from the standpoint of political philosophy. Then, restricting debate to epistemology, we will show that paternalism is based on an epistemic claim. Also, we will distinguish certain kind of paternalism as epistemic paternalism, and then will study the manners of actualization and justification of this kind of paternalism. Finally, the view is defend that the epistemic paternalism because of its valuable epistemic consequences will be legitimate if it construct on some certain criterions without postulating epistemic superiority of some people, and if it is accomplished by experts.
In this paper, first we attempt to explain the concept of paternalism from the standpoint of political philosophy. Then, restricting debate to epistemology, we will show that paternalism is based on an epistemic claim. Also, we will distinguish certain kind of paternalism as epistemic paternalism, and then will study the manners of actualization and justification of this kind of paternalism. Finally, the view is defend that the epistemic paternalism because of its valuable epistemic consequences will be legitimate if it construct on some certain criterions without postulating epistemic superiority of some people, and if it is accomplished by experts.
Keywords
این نوشتار نیز از همین سنت پیروی شده است.
الف) فارسی
-پوپر، کارل ( 1389 )، ناکجاآباد و خشونت: گفتارها و گفتگوهایی با کارل پوپر، ترجمه خسرو ناقد و
رحمان افشاری، تهران: جهان کتاب.
-کاپلستون، فردریک ( 1376 )، تاریخ فلسفه، ترجمه بهاءالدین خرمشاهی، ج 8، تهران: علمی فرهنگی و
سروش.
- همپتن، جین ( 1385 )، فلسفۀ سیاسی، ترجمۀ خشایار دیهیمی، تهران: طرح نو.
- لسناف، مایکل ایچ ( 1387 )، فیلسوفان سیاسی قرن بیستم، ترجمه خشایار دیهیمی، تهران: نشر ماهی.
- افلاطون ( 1380 )، مجموعۀ آثار، ترجمۀ محمد حسن لطفی، تهران: خوارزمی.
- دکارت (بیتا)، گفتار در روش درست به کار بردن خرد، ترجمه محمدعلی فروغی، بیجا.
-Chisholm,Roderick(1989), Theory of Knowledge, 2st eds. Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,.
-Hart,H.L:A(1966), Law, Liberty, and Morality , New York: Vintage
Books.
-Mead,Lawrence.M (1997), The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches
to Poverty, Brookings.
-Craig, Edward(1998), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge,.
-Goldman, Alvin(1992), "Epistemic Paternalism: Communication Control in
Law and Society” , in: Goldman.I, Liaisons,Asco Trade Typesetting,.
- ----------------(1999) Knowledge in a social world, Oxford University Press,.
-Hardwig, John (1985), "Epistemic Dependence", Journal of Philosophy
82,335-349.
-KleinigJohn (1983)paternalism ,Manchester University press.
-Mill, John Stuart (2008), On Liberty,Forgotten Books.
-Moore,J, Desmond,A (2009), Darwin's Sacred Cause, Penguin Group,.
-Schmidtz,David(2002), Robert Nozick, Cambridge University press.
)
Send comment about this article