Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Ph.D. of Philosophy of Religion, Faculity of Theology and Islamic Studies, Tehran University.
2 Associate Professor, Philosophy of Religion Group, Faculity of Theology and Islamic Studies, Tehran University
3 Associate professor Faculity of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran-Iran,
Abstract
“Parent analogy” is one of the important arguments that was suggested by Stephen Wykstra, one of the prominent philosopher of Skeptical Theism. By formulating this argument, Wykstra shows that like infant who doesn’t understand reasons of her parent who permit suffering for her, Human being also cannot understand reasons of God who permits suffering. According to this we cannot infer from not seeing the reasons of God to there is no reason for God. Therefore, evidential argument from evil fails. Bruce Russell, William Rowe and Trent Dougherty challenge “parent analogy”. They offer “loving parent analogy” instead. “Loving parent” never leave their child alone in suffering or at least they make clear that there is reason. In their view, if theism is true, it`s expecting that this world be a transparent one and we can understand God`s reasons. In this article we show that parent analogy confront limitations which shows that it can be used neither for Skeptical Theism nor against it. But we show that there are other ways to justify cognitive limitations of human being. For example Alston instead of appeal to parent analogy, offer other analogies and enumerate at least six limitations for human beings. Accordingly, we can say that the claim of cognitive limitation form the view of Skeptical Theism is justified
Highlights
- Alston, William P. (1991)“The Inductive Argument from Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition,” Philosophical Perspectives 5: 29–67.
- Alston, William P. (1996). “Some (Temporarily) Final Thoughts on Evidential Arguments from Evil.” In The Evidential Argument from Evil (ed. Daniel Howard-Snyder) (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press) 311–32.
- Copi, Irving M. (2014). Introduction to Logic. Pearson Education Limited.
- Dougherty, Trent G. (2012). “Reconsidering the Parent Analogy: Further Work for Skeptical Theists.”International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72(1): 17–25.
- Draper, Paul. (1996). “The Skeptical Theist.” In The Evidential Argument from Evil (ed. Daniel Howard-Snyder) (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 175–92.
- Hick, John. (2007) “Evil and the God of Love”, USA, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Jordan, Jeff. (2017). “the “Loving Parent” analogy” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion . DOI 10.1007/s11153-017-9623-4
- McBrayer, Justin. (2004). “Evidential Arguments from Evil and the "Seeability" of Compensating Goods” In Auslegung: a journal of philosophy, Volume 26, Number 1 (Winter/Spring, 2004), pp. 017-022. ISSN: 0733-4311.
- Rowe, William. (1979). “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 335–41.
- Rowe, William. (1984). “Evil and the Theistic Hypothesis: A Response to Wykstra.” In International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1984), pp. 95-100
- Rowe, William. (1991). “Ruminations about Evil.” Philosophical Perspectives5: 69–88.
- Rowe, William. (1996). “The Evidential Argument from Evil: A Second Look.” In The Evidential Argument from Evil (ed. Daniel Howard-Snyder) (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).
- Rowe, William. (2006). “Friendly Atheism, Skeptical Theism, and the Problem of Evil.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59.
- Russell, Bruce and Stephen Wykstra. (1988). “The "Inductive" Argument From Evil: A Dialogue” In PHILOSOPHICALTOPICS. Volume XVI, No. 2.
- Rutledge, Jonatan Curtis. (2017). “The parent analogy: a reassessment” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82:pp 5–14
- Timothy Perrine and Stephen J. Wykstra. (2017). “Skeptical Theism”. In. Edited by , Bethel College, Indiana, Paul K. Moser, Loyola University, Chicago Publisher: Cambridge University Press.pp 85-107.
- Trakakis, Nick. 2007. The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil, Springer Netherlands.
- Wielenberg, Erik. (2015).” The parent–child analogy and the limits of skeptical theism” ” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
- Wykstra, Stephen J. (1984). “The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of ‘Appearance’.” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 16(2): 73–93.
- Wykstra, Stephen J. (1996). “Rowe’s Noseeum Arguments from Evil.” In The Evidential Problem of Evil. (ed. Daniel Howard-Snyder) (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 126–50.
Keywords
)
Send comment about this article