- Bagheri, Khosrow. (2003) The identity of religious science, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Publications. (in Persian)
- Bagheri, Khosrow. (2012) Theory of Religious Empirical Science, Tehran: Publishing Organization of the Board of Support for Theory, Criticism and Debate Chairs. (in Persian)
- Carnap, R. (1967) Der logische Aufbau der Welt.Berlin: Weltkreis-Verlag, 1928; trans. Rolf A. George as The Logical Structure of the World.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Carnap, R. (2011) Philosophy of Science, (Fourth Edition). Trans. Yousef Afifi. Tehran: Niloufar Publishing.
- Hemple, C. G. (1950) “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning”. 11 Rev. Intern. de Philos. 41, pp. 41–63
- Golshani، M. (2000) “How to Make Sense of ' Islamic Science'?” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences،17(3). (in persian)
- Golshani, M. (2001) “Science and philosophy”. Allameh Research Journal (2), pp. 247-256. (in persian)
- Golshani, M. (2003-2004) “The Role of Metaphysics in Relating Science to Religion”. Letter of Science and Religion (21-24), pp. 29-36. (in persian)
- Golshani, M. (2011a) An Analysis of the Philosophical Perspectives of Contemporary Physicists. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in Persian)
- Golshani, M. (2011) From Secular Science to Religious Science, (Fifth Edition). Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in persian)
- Golshani, M. (2014) “Why Islamic science is meaningful and desirable”. Book Review, 72-73, pp. 207-238 (in persian)
- Hassani, M.; Alipour, M.; Movahed Abtahi, M. (2011) Religious science; Views and Considerations (Second Edition) Qom: Sobhan. (in Persian)
- Khosropanah, A. (2011a) “Judicial-ijtihad model in humanities”. Immortal Wisdom (19), pp. 29-66. (in Persian)
- Khosropanah, A. (2011) “In Search of Indigenous Humanities”. Cultural Universe (299-300), pp. 26-27. (in Persian)
- Kuhn، T. (1970a) “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” In I. L. Musgrave (Ed.)، Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 1–23). London: Cambridge University Press.
- Kuhn، T. (1970b) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kuhn، T. (1977) The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Ladyman، J. (2002) Understanding Philosophy of Science. London & New York: Routledge.
- Malekian, M. (2017) Thought Page. Retrieved from Iran Online: http://www.ion.ir/news/330620/ (in persian)
- Malekian, M. (2007) “Science without history, without geography”. Reflection of Thought (87), pp. 7-13. (in Persian)
- Paya, A. (2007) “Critical considerations of religious science and indigenous science”. Wisdom and Philosophy (10-11), pp. 39-76. (in Persian)
- Quine, W. V. O. (2004) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. in Quintessence: Basic Readings from the Philosophy of W.V. Quine. (1951) Roger F. Gibson, ed. Cambridge, Mass. London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Quine, W. V. O. (2004)“Epistemology Naturalized”. In Quintessence: Basic Readings from the Philosophy of W.V. Quine. (1969) Roger F. Gibson, ed. Cambridge, Mass. London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1992) Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1990; revised edn.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1995) From stimulus to Science. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sankey، H. (1997) Rationality، Relativism and Incommensurability. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Sankey، H. (2000) After Popper، Kuhn And Feyerabend. (N. Robert، & H. Sankey، Eds.) Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
- Zibakalam, S. (2009) “The foot of the logicians was wooden: a reflection on reason, reasoning, and rationality”. Sura Andisheh (46-47), pp. 175-176. (in persian)
- Zibakalam, S. (2016) “Indigenous theorizing and dilemmas and goals”. Methodology of Humanities (88), pp. 179-201. (in Persian)
)
Send comment about this article