The Evolutionary Process in Lamarckism and Darwinism: similarities and differences

Hosseini, Sayyed Mojtaba; Mansouri, Alireza

doi:10.22034/jpiut.2021.47295.2927

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ PhD of Philosophy of Science and Technology, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. Tehran, Iran

² Associate Professor of Philosophy of Science and Technology, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.47295.2927

Abstract

It is a widely held view that the inheritance of acquired characteristics plays an important role in Lamarck's ideas about evolution, and there are some counter-instances against it. As a result, his theory is called into question. This article explains that contrary to this view, the inheritance of acquired characteristics is a common ground between Lamarck and Darwin. And the contradictions could probably be resolved, as we shall see. The study shows that the main differences between the views of the two founders of evolutionary theory lie in their claims about the speed of evolution and the adoption of an individual or population approach to evolution and its purposiveness or randomness. In this commentary, we use these similarities and differences to discuss how not only is the quasi-scientific nature of Lamarck's theories unacceptable, but that maintaining Lamarck's explanatory framework is essential for a more accurate understanding of the evolutionary process. And it can in some ways complement the Darwinian and neo-Darwinian views of evolution. Therefore, using these two theoretical systems as complements will increase the explanatory power of evolutionary theories

Keywords

References

Bard, J. B. L. (2011). The next evolutionary synthesis: from Lamarck and Darwin to genomic variation and systems biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-9-30

Bowler, P. J. (2003). Evolution: the history of an idea. Univ of California Press.

Bulmer, M. (2004). Did Jenkin's swamping argument invalidate Darwin's theory of natural selection? The British Journal for the History of Science, 37(3): 81-297.

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London.

Deichmann, U. (2016). Epigenetics: The origins and evolution of a fashionable topic. Developmental biology, 416(1): 249-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.06.005

Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf433

Hodge, M. J. S. (1971). Lamarck's science of living bodies. The British Journal for the History of Science, 5(4), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400011572

Lamarck, J. (1914). Philosophie Zoologique. Translated by H Elliot as Zoological Philosophy. Paris.

Lewens, T. (2017). The nature of selection: an overview. The Routledge Handbook of Evolution and Philosophy, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764863

Liu, Y. S.; Zhou, X. M.; Zhi, M. X.; Li, X. J.; Wang, Q. L. (2009). Darwin’s contributions to genetics. Journal of applied genetics, 50(3): 177-184.

Loison, L. (2018). Lamarckism and epigenetic inheritance: a clarification. Biology & Philosophy, 33(3): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9642-2

Mayr, E. (1984). What is Darwinism today? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

Penny, D. (2015). Epigenetics, Darwin, and Lamarck. Genome biology and evolution, 7(6): 1758-1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv107

Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. B. (2010). Evolution–the extended synthesis.

Ruse, M. (2009). The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106: 10040-10047. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901011106

Wallace, A. R. (2009). On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely from the Original Type (1858). Alfred Russel Wallace Classic Writings, 1.

Weismann, A. (1893). The germ-plasm: a theory of heredity (Scribner’s).

Weiss, A. (2015). Lamarckian illusions. Trends in ecology & evolution, 30(10): 566-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.003

Wideman, J. G., Inkpen, S. A., Doolittle, W. F., & Redfield, R. J. (2019). Mutationism, not Lamarckism, captures the novelty of CRISPR–Cas. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9659-6

Wilkins, A. S. (2008). Waddington’s unfinished critique of neo-Darwinian genetics: then and now. Biological Theory, 3(3): 224-232. https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.3.224

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

The Evolutionary Process in Lamarckism and Darwinism: similarities and differences

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 16, Issue 39 - Serial Number 39
articles
Special Issue: Philosophy of Education (in Persian)
September 2022
Pages 577-593

The Evolutionary Process in Lamarckism and Darwinism: similarities and differences

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 16, Issue 39 - Serial Number 39 articlesSpecial Issue: Philosophy of Education (in Persian)September 2022Pages 577-593

Volume 16, Issue 39 - Serial Number 39
articles
Special Issue: Philosophy of Education (in Persian)
September 2022
Pages 577-593