Plato on the Threshold of Modern Era: fathers of modern Plato scholarship from Ficino to the Marburger Scholars

Amin Beidokhti, Hanif

doi:10.22034/jpiut.2022.49067.3066

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Hanif Amin Beidokhti

Fritz-Thyssen Postdoc Fellow, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich School of Ancient Philosophy (MUSAΦ). Germany.

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.49067.3066

Abstract

Although Plato has always been revered throughout the history of philosophy, the general trend of philosophy up to the modern era was Aristotelian. Even the Neoplatonists, with the exception of Plotinus, wrote more or less in the Aristotelian style and in form of Aristotelian commentaries. Philosophers knew very little about the authentic or historical Plato; Not only because Plato's writings were transmitted by the Neoplatonists, but also because Plato was understood in a Neoplatonic way. Ficino was the first to try to revive Plato during the Renaissance. However, his efforts did not result in an interpretive change. The real revival of Plato took place in the eighteenth century and in Germany. This revival is understudied in Persian. Though Schleiermacher is known for being one of Plato’s translators, it is not known what happened to Plato from Ficino to Schleiermacher. There is even scarce knowledge about Schleiermacher’s role in Plato scholarship and the process which led to Schleiermacher’s Plato. This article deals with the subject of Plato scholarship up to the emergence of the Romantic Plato. Departing from the conviction that novel philosophical ideas are not born ex nihilo, we will examine the early stages of Plato scholarship in order to recognize the figures whose legacy became the cornerstone of modern Plato scholarship. Thus, we examine the Plato scholarship of Ficino, Brucker, Tiedemann and Tennemann, and try to find out what distinguishes the modern or early modern interpretations from the traditional Plato and what are the grounding canons of modern Plato scholarship.

Keywords

Main Subjects

philosophy

References

Arnzen, R. (2017). Arabisches Mittelalter. In Christoph Horn, Jörn Müller and Joachim Söder (eds), Platon-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung: 452-459. 2^nd Ed. Metzler.

Beierwaltes, W. (1972). Platonismus und Idealismus, Vittorio Klostermann.

Brucker, J. (1731). Kurtze Fragen Aus der Philosophischen Historie Von Anfang der Welt, I. Theil: Biß auf die Geburt Christi, D. Bartholomai. https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_4ukGAAAAcAAJ

Brucker, J. (1766-1767). Historia critica philosophiae a mundi incunabulis ad nostram usque aetatem deducta. Breitkopf, 1^st Ed. 1742-44 (5 vols,); 2^nd Ed. 1766-67 (6 vols). English translation by W. Enfield as: The History of Philosophy […].

Copleston, F. (2009). A History of Philosophy, vol. 3, Late Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy: Ockham to Suarez, translated by E. Dadjou, Elmi-o Farhangi Publication. (In Persian)

Des Places, Édouard (1973, ed.), Numénius: Fragments. Les Belles Lettres.

Enfield, W. (1791-92). J. J. Brucker, The History of Philosophy, from the Earliest Periods, drawn up from Brucker's Historia critica philosophiae, 2 vols, Tegg.

Guldentops, G. (2017). Lateinisches Mittelalter. In: Ch. Horn et al. (eds), Platon-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, pp: 459-466.

Jaeger, W. (1997). Paideia, (3 vols), translated by M.H. Lotfi, Khwarazmi. (In Persian)

Kim, A. (2010). Plato in Germany: Kant – Natorp – Heidegger, Academia Verlag.

Leinkauf, T. (2017a). Die Cambridge Platonists, In Christoph Horn et al. (eds), Platon-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, pp. 477-487.

Leinkauf, T. (2017b). Deutsche Klassik und deutscher Idealismus/Platon-Philologie im 19. Jahrhundert. In Christoph Horn et al. (eds), Platon-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, pp. 488-513.

Longo, M. (2011). A ‘Critical’ History of Philosophy and the Early Enlightenment: Johann Jacob Brucker. In Gregorio Piaia and Giovanni Santinello (eds), Models of the History of Philosophy, Vol II, From Cartesian Age to Brucker, pp. 477-577. Springer.

Richard, M. D. (2015). Plato and the German Romantic Thinkers, Friedrich Schlegel and Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 36(1), 91-124.

Schmidt-Biggemann, W. (1998). Jacob Bruckers philosophiegeschichtliches Konzept. In W. Schmidt-Biggemann und Theo Stammen (eds), Jacob Brucker (1696–1770) Philosoph und Historiker der europäischen Aufklärung, pp. 113-134, Akademie Verlag.

Schneider, U. (1998). Das Eklektizismus-Problem der Philosophiegeschichte, In Schmidt-Biggemann und Stammen (eds), Jacob Brucker (1696–1770) Philosoph und Historiker […], pp. 135-158.

Szlezák, T. A. (1993). Platon lesen. Frommann-Holzboog.

Szlezák, T. A. (1997). Schleiermachers «Einleitung» zur Platon-Übersetzung von 1804. Ein Vergleich mit Tiedemann und Tennemann. Antike und Abendland, 43(46-62).

Szlezák, T. A. (2002). Friedrich Schleiermacher und das Platonbild des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Plato Journal 2, https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_2_6.

Szlezák, T. A. (2010). Von Brucker über Tennemann zu Schleiermacher. Eine folgenreiche Umwälzung in der Geschichte der neuzeitlichen Platondeutung, In Ada Neschke-Hentschke (ed.), Argumenta in Dialogos Platonis, Teil 1: Platoninterpretation und ihre Hermeneutik von der Antike bis zum Beginn des 19. Jhrts, 411-433. Schwabe.

Szlezák, T. A. (2016). Reading Palto, translated by A. Jamali, Negah-e Moasser. (In Persian)

Szlezák, T. A. (2019). Friedrich Schleiermacher’s Theory of the Platonic Dialogue and Its Legacy. In Alan Kim (ed.), Brill’s companion to German Platonism, pp. 165-191. Brill.

Tennemann, W. G. (1792-1795). System der Platonischen Philosophie, 4, Johann Ambrosius Barth, Bd I: 1792, Bd II-III: 1794; Bd IV: 1795.

Tennemann, W. G. (1798-1819). Geschichte der Philosophie, XI Bände. Johann Ambrosius Barth, Bd I: 1798, Bd. II: 1799.

Tiedemann, D. (1791-1797). Geist der speculativen Philosophie, 6 Bände. Akademische Buchhandlung. Bd 1, 1791: von Thales bis Sokrates; Bd 2, 1791: von Sokrates bis Carneades.

Tigerstedt, E. N. (1974). The Decline and Fall of the Neoplatonic Interpretation of Plato: An Outline and Some Observations. Societas Scientiarum Fennica.

Tigerstedt, E. N. (1977). Interpreting Plato. Almqvist & Wikseil.

Urmson, J. O. (2013, trans.). Simplicius: On Aristotle on the Soul 1.1-2.4, notes by P. Lautner, Bloomsbury.

Von Stein, H. (1875). Sieben Bücher Zur Geschichte des Platonismus. Unterst1chungen über das System des Plato und sein Verhältniss z11r späteren Theologie und Philosophie. Band III: das Verhältniss des Platonismus zur Philosophie der christlichen Zeiten enthaltend. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Plato on the Threshold of Modern Era: fathers of modern Plato scholarship from Ficino to the Marburger Scholars

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 17, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43
articles
Vol. 17, Issue 43, Summer 2023
August 2023
Pages 553-573

Plato on the Threshold of Modern Era: fathers of modern Plato scholarship from Ficino to the Marburger Scholars

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 17, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43 articlesVol. 17, Issue 43, Summer 2023August 2023Pages 553-573

Volume 17, Issue 43 - Serial Number 43
articles
Vol. 17, Issue 43, Summer 2023
August 2023
Pages 553-573