Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• Zeinab Yousefi ¹
• Mohammad Ali Akhgar ²
• Abbas Ahmadi Saadi ³

¹ PhD Candidate in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Fasa Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fasa, Iran.

² Assistant Professor of Philosophy Department, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran

³ Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, Fasa Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fasa, Iran

Abstract

İn this article, by analyzing the views of Allameh Tabatabai and Javadi Amoli on the theological-philosophical rule of grace in the issue of "inclusiveness in salvation", how this attitude has evolved in two contemporary thinkers and philosophers. The importance of this paper is in analyzing how the approach of these two thinkers in the discussion of the legitimacy of religions and its consequences in their inclusive discussion on the issue of salvation. In the meantime, Allameh Tabatabai is a kind of inclusiveness in legitimacy and salvation, which, according to the rule, favors the maximum salvation. But Javadi Amoli believes in exclusivism in legitimacy and in its relative minimalism. This research, which has been obtained by descriptive-analytical method and comparative study of the works of these two thinkers, has shown that despite the single interpretation of the two thinkers of the rule of grace in inclusiveness in salvation, some of their principles and approaches in presenting this interpretation, including in The subject of benefiting from the rule of grace is different and shows the evolution of the function of this rule in contemporary Islamic philosophy and theology.

Keywords

• inclusiveness
• salvation
• guidance
• rule of grace
• Allameh Tabatabai
• Javadi Amoli

Main Subjects

• philosophy