Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

PhD of Philosophy, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The Socratic Method known as elenchus is the method used in Plato’s earlier dialogues namely Socratic dialogues. This method was a response to the sophists’ claim about the teaching of the virtue. Socrates used this method to disclose their ignorance. Through questioning and answering, he tried to make others aware that the searching for knowledge and virtue is achievable in a dialectical process and in relation to the other. The Socratic Method is not a simple method of dialogue, but it also points to the finitude of human understanding and, consequently, to the nature of philosophical thinking. From Socrates’s viewpoint, philosophy means the love of knowledge, and the claim on absolute knowledge is nothing more than an illusion. Through question and answer, Socrates tries to challenge other’s claim of knowledge and put them on the path of searching for knowledge. Thus the Socratic Method can play a powerful role in teaching. In Socrates’s thought we observe the interconnectedness of elements, all of which are understood in relation to each other. The doctrine of recollection, elenchus, dialectical art, question and answer and so on are among these elements. In this paper, while paying attention to these elements we will try to examine the nature of the Socratic Method.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Copleston, Fredrick. (2001). A History of Philosophy, V. 1, translated by Jalal-al-din Mojtabavi, Tehran: Elmi – Farhangi Publication. (In persian).
Doortaj, Faryborz; Khani, MohammadHossein. (2017). Learning Psychology, Tehran: University of Allameh Tabataba’I Press. (In persian).
Fathi, Hassan. (2003). Dialectic in Plato’s philosophy, Journal of Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences University of Tabriz, No. 186: 1-22. (In persian).
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2005). A Century Of Philosophy/ Hans-Georg Gadamer in Conversation With Ricarrdo Dottori, Translated by Mahmoud Ebadian, Tehran: Akhtaran. (In persian).
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2013). The Beginning of Philosophy, Translated by Ezzatollah Fouladvand, Tehran: Hermes. (In persian).
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (1980). Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato, Translated and with an introduction by p. Christopher smith, New haven and London: Yale University Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (1986). The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy, Translated by P. C. smith, New Haven: Yale university press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2004). Truth and Method, Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, London: Continuum.
Heidegger, Martin. (2009). What is Called Thinking? Translated by Siavash Jammadi, Tehran: ghoghnoos. (In persian).
Jaeger, Werner. (1997). Paideia, Translated by MohammadHassan Lotfi, Tehran: khwarazmi. (In persian ).
Kierkegaard, Soren. (2016). On the Concept of Irony With Continual Reference to Socrates, Translated by Saleh Najafi, Tehran: Markaz Publication. (In persian).
Lawn, Chris and Keane, Niall. (2001). The Gadamer Dictionary, London: Continuum.
Patocka, Jan. (1999). Socrates, Translated by Mahmoud Ebadian, Tehran: Hermes. (In persian).
Plato. (2001). Plato: Complete Works, Translated by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi, Tehran: Khwarazmi. (In persian).
Selzak, Thomas Alexander. (2016). Reading Plato, Translated by Abbas Jamali, Tehran: Negahe Moaser. (In persian).
Shabani, Hassan. (2015). Instructional Skills, Vol. 1, Tehran: Samt. (In persian).
Taylor, Christopher Charles Whiston. (2013). Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. I, From the Beginning to Plato, Translated by Hassan Fathi, Tehran: Hekmat. (In persian).
Wilberding, Erick. (2019). Socratic Methods in the Classroom: Encouraging Critical Thinking and Problem Solving through Dialogue: Prufrock Press Inc.
Xenophon. (2015). The Memorable Thought of Socrates, Translated by MohammadHassan Lotfi, Tehran: Khwarazmi. (In persian)
CAPTCHA Image