Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate of Philosophy, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Philosophy Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran

Abstract

Perhaps assuming a principle which is beyond reason and being is the most characteristic of the Neoplatonic thought. This principle is absolutely ineffable and no epithet deserves it. We can talk about it merely by negation. But such a transcendent principle, which Plotinus introduced it to the platonic philosophy, did not remain without any critique among Neoplatonists. The most elaborated critique by a Neoplatonist is that of Damascius in the first part of his Problems and Solutions. He argues that the One, being an arche, cannot be transcendent, and being transcendent, refuses to be an arche. So, there is an inconsistency between being an arche and being transcendent. Therefore, the Neoplatonic One, which is the first principle, is not beyond being, rather it is a being. However, this claim, which is the corner stone of Damascius’ argument, has been neglected by the writers on the topic, and they have sought other formulations for his argument. Based on Damascius’ texts, we have argued that we can ascribe such a claim to Damascius, and further, regard it as the foundation of his belief in an absolutely transcendent beyond the One, which is completely ineffable and about which only silence is due.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahbel-Rappe, S. (1998). Scepticism in the Sixth Century? Damascius’ Doubts and Solutions Concerning First Principles. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 36(3), 337-363.
Ahbel-Rappe, S. (2010). Damascius: Problems and Solutions Concerning First Principles. Oxford University Press.
Ahbel-Rappe, S. (2018). Damascius the Platonic Successor: Socratic Activity and Philosophy in the 6th Century CE. In: Tarrant, H. et al, pp. 515-532.
Athanassiadi, P. (1999). Damascius: The Philosophical History. Apamea – Athens.
Banner, Nicholas. (2018). Philosophic Silence and the ‘One’ in Plotinus. Cambridge.
Burnyeat, M. (1976). Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy. The Philosophical Review, 85(1): 44-69.
Dillon, J. (1987). General Introduction. In: Morrow & Dillon, pp. xi-xliv.
Dillon, J. (1996). Damascius on the Ineffable. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 78, 120-129.
Dillon, J. (2003). The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347-274 ΒC). Oxford University Press.
Dillon, J. (2010). Intellect and the One in Porphyry’s Sententiae. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 4, 27-35.
Dodds, E. R. (1928). The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic One. The Classical Quarterly, 22(¾): 129-142.
Falcon, A. (ed.). (2016). Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Brill.
Festa, Nicolaus. (ed.). (1891). Iamblichus: De Communi Mathematica Scientia Liber. Reprinted 1975, Teubner.
Franke, W. (2004). Of the Ineffable: Aporetics of the Notion of an Absolute Principle. Arion, 12(1), 19-39.
Gerson, L. (ed.) (2010). The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
Golitsis, P. (2016). Simplicius and Philoponus on the Authority of Aristotle. In A. Falcon (ed.), pp. 419-438.
Greig, Jonathan. (2020). The First Principle in Late Neoplatonism: A Study of the One’s Causality in Proclus and Damascius. Brill.
Halfwassen, J. (2012). Monism and Dualism in Plato’s Doctrine of Principles. In Nikulin (ed). pp. 143-160.
Henn, Martin J. (2003). Parmenides of Elea: A Verse Translation with Interpretive Essays and Commentary to the Text. Praeger.
Krämer, H. J. (1990). Plato and the Foundations of Metaphysics. Translated by J. R. Catan. CEU.
Lautner, Peter. (1995). Introduction. In Urmson & Lautner, pp. 4-10.
Morrow, G. & Dillon, J. (1987). Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides. Princeton University Press.
Mueller, I. (2005). Simplicius: On Aristotle on the Heavens, Vol. 2. 10-14. Bloomsbury.
Nikulin, D. (ed.) (2012). The Other Plato: The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato’s Inner-Academic Teachings. State University of New York Press.
Perl, E. D. (2014). Thinking Being: Introduction to Metaphysics in the Classical Tradition. Brill.
Rappe, S. (2000). Reading Neoplatonism: Non-discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius. Cambridge.
Ross, D. (1951). Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Reprinted 1966, Oxford.
Tarán, Leonardo. (1981). Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary. Leiden-Brill.
Tarrant, H.; Layne, D. A.; Baltzly, D. & Renaud, F. (2018). Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Brill.
Urmson, J. O. (1992). Simplicius: Corollaries on Place and Time. Reprinted 2014, Bloomsbury.
Urmson, J. O. & Lautner, P. (1995). Simplicius: On Aristotle on the Soul, 1.1-2.4. Reprinted 2014, Bloomsbury,
Van Riel, G. (2010). Damascius. In Gerson (Ed), pp. 667-696.
Westerink, L. G. & Combès, J. (1986). Traité des premiers principes: Tome I, De l’ineffable et de l’un. Les Belles Lettres.
Westerink, L. G. & Combès, J. (1986). Traité des premiers principes: Tome III, De la procession de l’unifié. Les Belles Lettres.
Westerink, L. G. & Combès, J. (1989). Traité des premiers principes: Tome II, De la triade et de l’unifié. Les Belles Lettres.
Whittaker, J. (1969). ΕΠΕΚΕΙΝΑ ΝΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΟΥΣΙΑΣ. Vigiliae Christianae, 23(2), 91-104.
CAPTCHA Image