Comparing Martin Heidegger’s and Jalal Āl-e-Ahmad’s Views on Technology

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Administrative Sciences Economics, University of Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare Heidegger’s and Āl-e-Ahmad’s views on technology; first, the close relationship between subjectivism and modern technology was analyzed based on Heidegger, and subsequently, it was pointed out that Heidegger’s approach towards technology is a critical confrontation based on engagement/disengagement dialectics. Then Jalal Āl-e-Ahmad’s view on technology was analyzed, emphasizing that, unlike Heidegger, with a philosophical, ontological, and anticipatory approach to modern technology, Āl-e-Ahmad took a selective and voluntarist approach towards modern technology by adopting a political and social stance. Āl-e-Ahmad, like Promethean and leading intellectuals and reformers, believed that a Westoxificated society is a society that has not yet achieved technology and is technologically dependent on the West. Therefore, to deal with Westoxification, it should become a technological power by adopting a will-based approach-- a machine must be built and owned; however, at the same time, one should not be got caught by the machine because it is a means and not a goal. Unlike Āl-e-Ahmad, Heidegger considered technology not a mere tool but a kind of ontology and way of thinking that affects all humans’ areas and affairs, so it is not easy to escape modern technology’s grip.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abdolkarimi, B. (2008). We and Nietzsche’s World. Nashr-e Elm Publications. [In Persian]
Abdolkarimi, B. (2013). Heidegger in Iran. Wisdom & Philosophy Institute. [In Persian]
Abdolkarimi, B. (2015). Heidegger in Our Historical Horizon. Naqd-e Farhang Publications. [In Persian]
Ahmadi, B. (1994). Modernity and Critical Thought. Nashr-e Markaz Publications. [In Persian]
Ahmadi, B. (2017). Heidegger and the History of Being. Nashr-e Markaz Publications. [In Persian]
Āl-e-Ahmad, J. (1979). A Three-Year Report. Ravaq publications. [In Persian]
Āl-e-Ahmad, J. (2001). Gharbzdegi (Westoxification). Ferdows Publications. [In Persian]
Bahrami Komeil, N. (2014). Typology of Iranian Intellectuals. Kavir Publications. [In Persian]
Ghaninejad, M. (1998). Modernity and Development in Contemporary. Nashr-e Markaz Publications. [In Persian]
Golestani, M. (2015). Deconstructing the Texts of Jalal Āl-e-Ahmad. Niloofar Publications. [In Persian]
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, translated by W. Lovitt, Garland Publishing, INC.
Heidegger, M. (1987). An Introduction to Metaphysics, translated by R. Manheim, Yale University Press.
Heiegger, M. (1962). Being and Time, translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Blackwell.
Jabbari, A. (2011). Philosophy, Reproduction and Sexuality. Porsesh Publications. [In Persian]
Jabbari, A. (2014). Dasein Mining or Dasein Analysis. Porsesh Publications. [In Persian]
Johnson, P. (2008). Heidegger. Mehr Publications. [In Persian]
Mahmoudi, S. A. (2019). Iranian Thinkers. Ney Publications. [In Persian]
Manouchehri, A. (2008). Martin Heidegger. Cultural Research Office. [In Persian]
Nasri, A. (2011). Confronting Modernity. Nashr-e Elm Publications. [In Persian]
Rikhtegaran, M. (2003). Phenomenology, Art, Modernity. Saqhi Publications. [In Persian]
Rikhtegaran, M. (2010). A reflection on the Theoretical Foundations of Art. Saghi publications. [In Persian]
Zeymaran, M. (2010). Philosophy between the Present and the Future. Payan Publications. [In Persian]
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Volume 18, Issue 48 - Serial Number 48
Articles
Vol. 18, Issue 48 , Autumn 2024
September 2024
Pages 249-260

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics