Abellán C. & et al. (2018). Challenging local realism with human choices, Nature, 557, pp. 212-216.
Abellán, C. & et al. (2015). Generation of fresh and pure random numbers for loophole-free Bell tests, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (25), 250403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250403
Allison, H. E. (1990). Kant’s theory of freedom, Cambridge University Press.
Allison, H. E. (1996). Idealism and freedom: essays on Kant's theoretical and practical philosophy, Cambridge University Press.
Aspect A, Dalibard J, & Roger G. (1982). Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers, Phys Rev Lett., 49 (25), 1804–1807.
Aspect A, Grangier P, & Roger G. (1982). Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys Rev., 49. 91-94.
Augustine. (2011). On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Bell, J. S. (1964). On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox, Physics, 1 (3), 195-200.
Bell, J. S. (2004). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge Univ. Press.
Bitbol, M. (2010). Reflective metaphysics: understanding quantum mechanics from a Kantian standpoint. Philosophica, 83 (1), 53-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82161
Bitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., & Petitot, J. (Eds.). (2009). Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics. Springer.
Bitbol, M. & Osnaghi, S. (2013). Bohr’s Complementarity and Kant's Epistemology. In Bohr, 1913-2013, Séminaire Poincaré XVII, 145-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14316-3_8
Borges, M. (2019). Emotion, Reason and Action in Kant. Bloomsbury Academic.
Brans, C. (1988). Bell’s theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variables, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 27 (2), pp. 219-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00670750
Degorre J., S. Laplante, & J. Roland, (2005). Simulating quantum correlations as a distributed sampling problem, Phys. Rev. A, 72 (6), 062314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.062314
Dominik R. & et al, (2018). Cosmic Bell Test Using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, p. 080403. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.05966
Falkenburg, B. (forthcoming). From Heisenberg to Mittelstaedt and Scheibe: Kant’s Impact on the “German Copenhagen School” of Quantum Mechanics. In Biagioli, F. Giovanelli, M. (eds.): Neo-Kantian Perspectives on the Exact Sciences.
Fürst, M. et al. (2010). High speed optical quantum random number generation, Opt. Express, 18, p. 13029.
Esfeld, M. (2015). Bell’s theorem and the issue of determinism and indeterminism. Foundations of Physics, 45(5), p. 471-482.
Giustina, M. et al. (2015). Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 115, p. 250401.
Hall M. J. W. (2010). Relaxed Bell inequalities and Kochen-Specker theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, p. 250404.
Hall M. J. W. (2011). Local Deterministic Model of Singlet State Correlations Based on Relaxing Measurement Independence’, Phys. Rev. A, 84, p. 022102.
Handsteiner J. et al., (2017). Cosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, p. 060401.
Hanna, R. (2006). Kant, Science and Human Nature, Oxford University Press.
Hensen B. et al. (2016). Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis, Sci. Rep., 6, p. 30289.
Hensen, B. et al. (2015). Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres, Nature, 526, pp. 682–686.
Kant, I. (1998). [KrV], Critique of pure reason, translated by P. Guyer and A. Wood, Cambridge University Press.
Kauark-Leite (2012). Théorie quantique et philosophie transcendantale: dialogues possibles. Hermann,
Kauark-Leite (2017). Transcendental Versus Quantitative Meanings of Bohr’s Complementarity Principle. In H. Folse & J. Faye (eds.), Niels Bohr and Philosophy of Physics: Twenty-First Century Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 67-89.
Ou, Z.Y. & Mandel, L. (1988). Violation of Bell’s inequality and classical probability in a two-photon correlation experiment, Phys Rev Lett., 61, 50-53.
Rosenfeld, W. et al. (2017). Event-ready Bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, p. 010402.
San Pedro, I. (2014). Measurement independence, parameter independence and non-locality. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4(3), 369-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13194-014-0091-8
Shalm, L. K. et al. (2015). Strong loophole-free test of local realism, Phys. Rev. Lett., 115, p. 250402.
Shih, Y. H. & Alley, C. O. (1988). New type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion, Phys Rev Lett., 61, 2921–2924.
Scheidla, T.et al. (2010). Violation of local realism with freedom of choice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, p. 19708-19713.
Shimony, A., Horne, M. A., & Clauser, J. F. (1976). Epistemological Letters. Reprinted in Dialectica 39
Tapster, P. R., Rarity, J. G. & Owens, P. C. M. (1994). Violation of Bell’s inequality over 4 km of optical fiber, Phys Rev Lett., 73, pp. 1923–1926.
Weihs, G. & et al. (1998). Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 5039.
Wood, A. (1984). Kant’s Compatibilism, in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, Edited by A. Wood, pp. 73–101.
)
Send comment about this article