Kant’s Critical Analysis of the Story of Abraham and the Near Sacrifice of Isaac

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate professor of philosophy, wisdom and logic Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This article explains Kant’s critical analysis of the religious story of the Binding of Isaac in Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (2001) and The Conflict of the Faculties (1798). From Kant’s perspective, a command to sacrifice one’s child—if it conflicts with the moral law—cannot originate from a divine source. In this critique, Kant’s concern extends beyond theology; he seeks to defend the authority of practical reason and moral conscience against any purported divine command that contradicts them. In his view, the uncritical and morally unreflective acceptance of religious imperatives leads to blind obedience and the erosion of individual moral responsibility within society. The article argues that Kant’s interpretation of the Abrahamic narrative forms part of his broader project of transforming religion into a rational, ethics-centered domain, free from superstition and the coercive authority of external institutions. By emphasizing conscience as a duty, Kant maintains that religion is justifiable only insofar as it remains subordinate to practical reason. Accordingly, the figure of Abraham portrayed in this religious tale is not to be admired uncritically; rather, it calls for a skeptical and morally vigilant reading of the narrative itself. The article thus underscores Kant’s deep commitment to moral autonomy as the foundation of both individual virtue and social order.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Holy Bible
Asghari, M. (2010). Kierkegaard’s Abraham and Levinas’s Abraham. Philosophy of Religion Research8(2), 51-74. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2012.1121
Augustine. (1998). The City of God against the Pagans. Edited by R. W. Dyson. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Green, R. M. (1988). Religion and Moral Reason: A New Method for Comparative Study. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kahn, S. (2021). Kant's Theory of Conscience. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 
Kant, I. (2001a). Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (2001). Translated by G. di Giovanni, in Kant.
Kant, I. (2001b). The Conflict of the Faculties (1798). Translated by Mary J. Gregor and Robert Anchor, in Kant.
Kant, I. (2001c). Religion and Rational Theology (Cambridge edition of Works of Immanuel Kant). Translated and edited by Allen W. Wood and George Di Giovanni. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1798). Critique of Practical Reason (1788). Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor, in Kan
Kant, I. (1999). Practical Philosophy (Cambridge edition of Works of Immanuel Kant). Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 
Meybodī, Rashīd al-Dīn. (2014). Kashf al-asrār wa ʿuddat al-abrār (The unveiling of the mysteries and the provision of the pious). Edited by A. A. Ḥikmat. Tehran, Amir Kabir Publication. (in Persian)
Narāqī, Mullā Aḥmad. (1983). Mathnawī Taqdīs. Edited by H. Narāqi. Tehran, Amir Kabir Publication. (in Persian)
Nica, D. (2017). Modern Perspectives on Faith: Abraham’s Case in Kant and Kierkegaard. Reconstructions and Critical Remarks, In ANNALS of the University of Bucharest, Philosophy Series, Vol. LXVI (1): 107 –123.
Palmquist, S. R. & Rudisill, P. Mc. (2009). Three Perspectives on Abraham’s Defense against Kant’s Charge of Immoral Conduct, In The Journal of Religion, 89(4), 467-497.
Pasternack, L. R. (2014). Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. New York, Routledge.
Sarebannejad, M. & Akvan, M. (2023). Comparison of the Narrative of the Sacrifice of Son by Abraham in Ibn ʿArabī's Mysticism and Kierkegaard's Existentialist Attitude. Philosophy20(2), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.22059/jop.2022.347679.1006737
Worcester, T. (2017, Ed.). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Jesuits. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wood, A. (2020). Kant and Religion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
CAPTCHA Image