Hermeneutic Analysis of Ibn Arabi’s Theory of “Continuous Revelation” and Its Comparison with Roland Barthes’ Theory of “Open-Closed Texts”

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 PhD Candidate, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Hermeneutic analysis (Hermeneutics) of texts is a new branch of Islamic studies that seeks to discover the messages, signs and hidden meanings of revelation and Quranic verses. The mystical views of Mohy al-Din Ibn Arabi, one of the greatest mystics of the Islamic world, are mostly based on the meta-textual hermeneutics assigned to him and interpretations far from the appearance of Quranic verses Hermeneutical views of Ibn Arabi of revelation and Quranic verses can be assayed and studied in his works including Futuhat Al Makkyyah, Fusus Al Hikam as well as the Quranic exegeses which are attributed to him. In present essay, we first study Ibn Arabi’s general perspective of “Revelation” and then continue to discuss the hermeneutic analysis of his theory of “Continuous Revelation” and finally we compare Ibn Arabi’s theory with Roland Barthes’ theory of “Open-Closed Texts”. The results of the present study show that the manifestation and emergence of the mystical theory of “Continuous Revelation” is of a literary and artistic nature and despite certain differences, one can find considerable similarities and compatibilities with the theory of “Closed-Open Texts”. To put it otherwise, this essay explains the considerable similarity of Ibn Arabi’s mystical theory of “continuous revelation” and Roland Barthes’ “closed-open texts” from the point of view of the emergence and infusion of hermeneutical meanings in/ into the reader’s mind and demonstrates that regardless of the mystical nature of the theory of “continuous revelation” its objective appearance and emergence has taken form based on the literary and artistic dimensions. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Holy Quran.
Agah, H. (1996). Ahl Al Bayt on Quranic Hermeneutics, Journal of Quranic Studies, 2(5,6), 196-211
Allen, G. (2015). Roland Barthes, translation of Payam Yazdanjoo, Tehran: Markaz.
Azizi, H. (2019). A Study of Hafez’s Techniques in Making the Text Unequivocal, Journal of Literary Text Studies, 23(79), pp. 7-30.
Barthes, R. (2016). The pleasure of the text, Trans. P. Yazdanjo, Tehran: Markaz.
Dadju, Y (2011). An Analysis of Revelation in Ibn Arabi’s Thought, Journal of Mystical Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kashan, no. 16, pp. 139-156.
Erol Kilic, M. (2015). Ibn Arabi’s Horizons: A General Perspective of His Life and Works, trans. T. Subhani, first impression, Tehran: Hermes.
Ghani, Q. (1952). On Sufism, First Edition, Tehran: Majles Press.
Hajji Rabi’, M. (2015). A Comparative Study of Ibn Arabi’s Mystical Hermeneutics Focusing on Contemporary Hermeneutical Debates, Journal of Religious Thought, Shiraz University, 15(4), 133-150.
Ibn Arabi, M. (1998). Rahmah min Al Rahman fi Tafsir va Esharat Al Quran, edited by M. Ghurab, Beirut: Dar Ehya Al Turath Al Arabi.
Ibn Arabi, M. (1986). Futuhat AL Makkyyah, 4 vols., Cairo: Al-Maktabat Al-Arabiya.
Kakaei, Q. (2014). Pantheism according to Ibn Arabi and Meister Eckhart, Sixth Edition, Tehran: Hermes.
Kamarei, A. (2012). Ibn Arabi on Prophetic Revelation, Journal of Mystical Wisdom, 1(3), 105-138.
Khwarizmi, H. (1985). Explanation of Fusūs al-Hikam, With the efforts of Najib Mayele Hervy, Tehran: Movla.
Mahmoud Al-Ghurab, M. (2015). Role of Imagination in Ibn Arabi’s Thoughts, trans. M. Farahmand, Second Edition, Tehran: Jami.
Mojtaheed-Shabestari, M. (2010). Hermeneutics, the Book and Tradition, Tehran: Tarh-e No. 
Movahedi, M. (2011). Mystical Interpretation of “Removing Shoes by Moses in Holy Land”, Journal of Mystical and Mythological Literature, 7(23).
Newton, K.M. (1988). The Death of the author Twentieth century literary theory, London: Macmillan.
Palmer, R. E. (2011). Hermeneutics (interpretation theory in Schleimacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer), Translated by M. S Hanaei Kashani, Tehran: Hermes.
Purnamdarian, T, Alavi Moqaddam, M. (2005). Open Texts-Close Texts, Journal of Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 48, pp. 11-26.
Sahabi, Y. (1967). Human Creation, Thirteenth Edition, Tehran: Heydari Press.
Shoar, Y. (1990). Interpretation of Difficult Verses, Third Edition, Tehran: Pazhuhesh.
Shafei-Kadkani, M. (2013). Language of Poetry in Sufi Prose, First Edition, Tehran: Sokhan.
Shafei-Kadkani, M. (1996). Imaginary Images in Persian Poetry, Sixth Edition, Tehran: Agah Press.
Shamisa, S. (2009). Literary Criticism, Third Edition, Tehran: Mitra Press.
Shamse Tabrizi. (1998). Magalate Shamse Tabrizi, Corrected by M. A. Movahed, Tehran: Khwarizmi.
Sohravardi, Shahabuddin Y. (1994). Collection of works by Sheikh Ishraq, Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Weinsheimer, J. (2010). Philosophical hermeneutics and literary theory, Translated by M. Olia, Tehran: Gognoos.
Zamani-Qeshlaqi, A. (2012). Ibn Arabi on Revelation, Journal of Rational Sciences, No. 3, pp. 87-110.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Volume 19, Issue 53 - Serial Number 53
Articles
Issue 53, Winter 2026
December 2025
Pages 829-846

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics