Investigating the Compatibility of Neuroscience and Education from the Perspective of Philosophy of Education

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The primary aim of this article is to critically examine the feasibility of integrating neuroscience and education from the perspective of the philosophy of education. It addresses the question of what kind of relationship between these two fields can be regarded as philosophically justifiable and educationally acceptable. This question is explored through conceptual analysis and a critical review of relevant interdisciplinary literature. Although neuroeducation has been institutionalized in several universities worldwide, it has also been criticized by philosophers of education, some of whom have dismissed it as another form of “neuromyth.” In response, this study examines major proposals for relating neuroscience and education and identifies three possible models: subservient, oppositional, and interactive. The article argues that the interactive approach provides the most defensible framework. To support this claim, it engages with key objections raised by philosophers of education concerning the epistemological and normative limits of neuroscience. Drawing on the work of Sidney Hook, Harry Broudy, and William Frankena, the study emphasizes the importance of grounding the philosophy of education in the scientific dimensions of educational practice. Through selected examples, the article illustrates how neuroscientific findings can contribute to clarifying educational aims, improving learning processes, and refining core concepts such as cognition and thought. Adopting a “soft dualism” perspective, it argues that philosophy of education necessarily involves both descriptive (“is”) and normative (“ought”) dimensions. The article concludes that neuroscience, by illuminating the descriptive aspects of learning and cognition, can meaningfully inform educational theory and practice without undermining their normative foundations.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in cognitive sciences10(4), 146-151.
Bagheri, K. (1996). Human as an agent: A comparative discussion on the presuppositions of psychology. Journal of Howzeh and University, 3 (9).
Bagheri, K. (2013). Celebrating Moderate Dualism in the Philosophy of Education: A Reflection on the H irst‐C arr Debate. Journal of Philosophy of Education47(4), 564-576.
Bagheri, K. (2013a). The ideal model of education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Madreseh Publications.
Bagheri, K. (2013b). Teaching “to” and learning “from”: Transformation in education in light of agency and interaction.  Research Journal of the Foundations of Education, 3(2), 5-16.
Bagheri, K., Sajadieh, N., & Tavassoli, T. (2010).  Approaches and methods of research in the philosophy of education. Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies.
Blakemore, S. J., & Frith, U. (2009).  The learning brain: Lessons for education (S. K. Kharrazi, Trans.). SAMT Publications. (Original work published 2005).
Broudy, H. S. (2007). How can philosophy of education be philosophical?] (S. Beheshti, Trans.). In S. Beheshti (Ed.), A context for the recognition and critique of the philosophy of education in the Western world. Ettela'at Publications. (Original work published 1954).
Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational researcher26(8), 4-16.
Carew, T. J., & Magsamen, S. H. (2010). Neuroscience and education: An ideal partnership for producing evidence-based solutions to guide 21st century learning. Neuron67(5), 685-688.
Cigman, R. & Davis, A. (2009). New philosophy of learning. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Clark, J. (2015). Philosophy, neuroscience and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory47(1), 36-46.
Clark, J. (2017). Where neuroscience and education meet: Can emergentism successfully occupy the middle ground between mind and body? Educational Philosophy and Theory50(4), 404-416.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Damasio, A. (2015).  Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain (R. Amir Rahimi, Trans.). Mehr Vista. (Original work published 2010).
Damasio, A. (2019). The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures. Vintage.
Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace. Vintage.
Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Damasio, A. R. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Davis, A. (2004). The credentials of brain‐based learning. Journal of philosophy of education38(1), 21-36.
Davis, A. (2013). Neuroscience and Education: At Best a Civil Partnership: A Response to Schrag. Journal of Philosophy of Education47(1), 31-36.
Della Sala, Sergio, and Mike Anderson. (2012). Neuroscience in Education: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1930). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education (Vol. 8). New York: Macmillan.
Gleichgerrcht, E., Lira Luttges, B., Salvarezza, F., & Campos, A. L. (2015). Educational neuromyths among teachers in Latin America. Mind, Brain, and Education9(3), 170.
Goldberg, H. (2022). Growing brains, nurturing minds—neuroscience as an educational tool to support students’ development as life-long learners. Brain sciences12(12), 1622.
Goswami, U. (2008). Principles of learning, implications for teaching: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education42(3‐4), 381-399.
Grospietsch, F., & Lins, I. (2021). Review on the prevalence and persistence of Neuromyths in education—Where we stand and what is still needed. Frontiers in Education, 6, 665752.
Hirst, P. H. (1993). Education, knowledge and practices. Beyond liberal education: Essays in honour of Paul H. Hirst, 184-99.
Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (Eds.). (2011). The logic of education (Vol. 16). Routledge.
Hirst, P., & Carr, W. (2005). Philosophy and education—a symposium. Journal of Philosophy of Education39(4), 615-632.
HOWARD‐JONES, P. A. U. L. (2008). Philosophical challenges for researchers at the interface between neuroscience and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education42(3‐4), 361-380.
Howard-Jones, Paul A. )2012(. Education and Neuroscience: Evidence, Theory and Practical Application. reprint. London: Routledge.
Hume, D. (2000). A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press.
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, Learning, and the Brain: Exploring the Educational Implications of Affective Neuroscience (The Norton Series on the Social Neuroscience of Education). WW Norton & Company.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. R. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain and Education. 1(1). 3-10
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Gotlieb, R. (2017). Embodied brains, social minds, cultural meaning: Integrating neuroscientific and educational research on social-affective development. American Educational Research Journal54(1_suppl), 344S-367S.
Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2017).  An introduction to cognitive neuroscience (S. Zarrabian, M. Nasehi, & A. Haghparast, Trans.). Nashr-e Ensan. (Original work published 2012).
Jensen, Eric (2004). Brain and Learning (L.Mohammadhossein, S, Razavi, trans.). Nashr-e Madreseh. (Original work published 2001).
Joldersma, C. W. (2016). What Can Philosophers of Education Contribute to the Conversations that Connect Education and Neuroscience? In Neuroscience and Education (pp. 1-12). Routledge.
Kharrazi, S. K., & Talkhabi, M. (2011).  Foundations of cognitive education. SAMT Publications.
Kraft, V. (2012). Neuroscience and education: Blind spots in a strange relationship. Journal of Philosophy of Education46 (3), 386-396.
Matta, C. (2021). Neuroscience and educational practice–A critical assessment from the perspective of philosophy of science. Educational Philosophy and Theory53(2), 197-211.
Nouri, A. (2015). Neuroscientific principles and foundations of learning and education. SAMT Publications.
Nouri, A. (2016). Neuro-cultural foundations of learning and development: Toward a culturally responsive curriculum. Iranian Journal of Curriculum Studies, 11 (43), 1-20.
Nouri, A., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2010). A critical explanation of the position of neuroscience in the domain of educational knowledge and practice. Advances in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 83-100.
Patten, K. E. (2011). The somatic appraisal model of affect: Paradigm for educational neuroscience and neuropedagogy. Educational philosophy and theory, 43(1), 87-97.
Purdy, N., & Morrison, H. (2009). Cognitive neuroscience and education: unravelling the confusion. Oxford Review of Education35(1), 99-109.
Ribot, O. (2007). Philosophy of education (S. Beheshti, Trans.). In S. Beheshti (Ed.), A context for the recognition and critique of the philosophy of education in the Western world. Ettela'at Publications. (Original work published 1968).
Scheffler, I. (1997). Computers in schools? (K. Bagheri, Trans.). In K. Bagheri & M. Attaran (Eds.), Contemporary philosophy of education. Mehrab-e Ghalam Publications. (Original work published 1986).
Schrag, F. (2011). Does neuroscience matter for education? Educational theory61(2), 221-237.
Schrag, F. (2013). Can this marriage be saved? The future of ‘neuro‐education’. Journal of Philosophy of Education47(1), 20-30.
Smeyers, P. (2016). Neurophilia: Guiding educational research and the educational field? Journal of Philosophy of Education50(1), 62-75.
Sylvan, L. J., & Christodoulou, J. A. (2010). Understanding the role of neuroscience in brain-based products: A guide for educators and consumers. Mind, Brain, and Education4(1), 1-7.
Talkhabi, M. (2012). The link between neuroscience and education: Challenges and hopes.  Advances in Cognitive Science, 14(2), 9-22.
Tan, Y. S. M., & Amiel, J. J. (2022). Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: Case of professional development in British Columbia. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 70–87
Tardif, E., Doudin, P. A., & Meylan, N. (2015). Neuromyths among teachers and student teachers. Mind, brain, and Education9(1), 50-59.
Thomas, M. S. C., & Arslan, Y. (2025). Why does the brain matter for education? British Journal of Educational Psychology95(2), 303-320.
Thomas, M. S. C., Howard-Jones, P., Dudman-Jones, J., Palmer, L. R. J., Bowen, A. E. J., & Perry, R. C. (2024). Evidence, policy, education and neuroscience—The state of play in the UK. Mind, Brain, and Education, 18, 461–473.
Torrijos-Muelas, M., González-Víllora, S., & Bodoque-Osma, A. R. (2021). The persistence of Neuromyths in the educational settings: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psycholog y, 11, 591923.
Varma, S., McCandliss, B. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational researcher37(3), 140-152.
Weisberg, D. S., Taylor, J. C., & Hopkins, E. J. (2015). Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Judgment and Decision making10(5), 429-441.
Wolfe, P. (2003).  Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice (D. Abolghasemi, Trans.). Madreseh Publications. (Original work published 2001).
CAPTCHA Image