A Reflection on Iran’s Current Philosophy of Education

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Professor of Philosophy of Education Department, University of Tehran. Tehran, Iran.

10.22034/jpiut.2025.70919.4387

Abstract

The present article seeks to critically examine the process through which philosophy of education emerged in modern Iran. Philosophy of education may be approached either implicitly or explicitly. This study primarily focuses on the explicit form of philosophy of education as an academic discipline, while also briefly considering its implicit forms—both before and after the establishment of the Dār al-Funūn—in order to shed light on the background that made the explicit discipline possible. The method employed is historical and philosophical analysis. The findings indicate that, due to the country’s overall backwardness, not only the implicit philosophy of education during the period of modernization but also the emergence of its explicit academic form by its founders developed in a state of intellectual passivity toward modern Western philosophies of education. The major orientations in Iranian philosophy of education have stemmed from three Western sources—German, Swiss, and American. The German orientation was introduced by Mohammad-Bāgher Hushyar; the Swiss orientation by Gholām-Hossein Shokuhi; and the American orientation by Ali Shari ‘atmadari. Without committing a fallacy of anachronism, these founders’ views are criticized. It may nonetheless be argued that their passive orientation prevented them from a critical engagement with the Westen perspectives and thus hindered the development of a philosophy of education suited to Iran’s own context. It appears that such an effort must proceed critically at the center of a triangle whose three sides consist of Iranian culture, Islamic culture, and modern culture. For my part, I have sought to contribute to this endeavor by offering a critique of pragmatist and constructivist approaches and, at the same time, by advancing an interpretation of Islamic culture grounded in an account of human agency. This approach to human agency leads—ontologically, epistemologically, and anthropologically—to a form of constructive realism, and axiologically to transformative traditionalism. Based on its own conceptual space, it places certain educational guidelines at the forefront, such as the notion of asymmetric interaction, which is distinct from both the traditional teacher-centered view and the modern learner-centered view.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adamiyyat, F. (1969). AmirKabir and Iran, Tehran, Kharazmi Publishing. (in Persian)
Bagheri, K. (2010). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Philosophy of Curriculum (Vol. 2), Tehran, Elmi va Farhangi Publishing. (in Persian)
Bagheri-Noaparast, K. (2016). Islamic education as asymmetrical democratic interaction. In N. Noddings & H. Lees (Eds.), Palgrave International Handbook of Alternative Education. New York, NY: Macmillan Press.
Bagheri, K. (2020). Human Agency: A Religious and Philosophical Approach, Tehran, Vakavosh Publishing. (in Persian)
Bagheri, K. (2024). A Renewed Look at Religion and Religiosity, Vakavosh Publishing. (in Persian)
Bagheri, K., & Khosravi, Z. (2008). Contemporary Psychological Theories: Toward Constructivist Realism (In Persian). Tehran, Elm Publishing. (in Persian)
Bagheri-Noaparast, K. & Khosravi, Z. (2011). Deconstructive religious education. Religious Education, 106(1), 82–104. (in Persian)
Debesse, M. (1957). Les étapes de l’éducation. (Trans. A. M. Kardan, Persian translation published 1972). Tehran, University of Tehran Press. (in Persian)
Dewey, J. (1938/1976). Logic; The Theory of Research (A. Shari‘atmadari, Trans.) University of Isfahan Press (In Persian).
Hushyar, M. (1937). The True Definition of Education, Journal of Education, (3), 135–137. Ministry of Education. (in Persian)
Hushyar, M. (1956). Principles of Education, Tehran, University of Tehran Press. (in Persian)
Ministry of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (2011). Theoretical Foundations of the Fundamental Transformation of the Formal and Public Education System (In Persian).
Mostofa, S. M. (2024). Exploring the common ground: A comparative analysis of Zoroastrianism and Islam. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh (Humanities), 69(2), 223–237.
Nasr, S. H. (1996). The Islamic intellectual tradition in Persia. Curzon Press.
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand Is to Invent: The Future of Education (George-Anne Roberts, Trans.). Grossman Publishers.
Piaget, J. (1988). Où va l’éducation (P. Dadsetan & M. Mansour Trans.). Tehran, University of Tehran Press (In Persian).
Pollak, J. E. (1982). Pollak’s travelogue: Iran and Iranians (K. Jahandari, Trans.) (In Persian). Kharazmi Publishing. (Original work published 1865)
Popper, K. (1999). All Life is Problem Solving. Routledge.
Rorty, R. (1999). Education as Socialization and as Individuation. In Philosophy and Social Hope (pp. 114–126). New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Roshani Zafaranlu, G. (1975). Amir Kabir and Dar al-Fonun, Tehran, University of Tehran Press. (in Persian)
Russell, B. (1954). A history of Western philosophy, Simon & Schuster.
Sālih, S. (Ed.). (1967). Nahj al-Balāgha, Dār al-Andalus.
Shariati, A. (1979). Philosophy of Education, Be’that Publishing. (in Persian)
Shari‘atmadari, A. (2006). Principles and Philosophy of Education, Tehran, AmirKabir Publishing. (in Persian)
Shokuhi, G. (1984). Methods of Teaching Arithmetic and Geometry, Self-published. (in Persian)
Shokuhi, G. (2015). Foundations and Principles of Education, Mashhad, Astan-e Qods Publishing. (in Persian)
Tusi, M. A. (1961). A summary of the Overseas Consultants’ Report on Iranian culture (Publication No. 1) Council for the Study of Iranian Culture (In Persian).
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Volume 19, Issue 53 - Serial Number 53
Articles
Issue 53, Winter 2026
December 2025
Pages 267-284

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics