Social Constructs and the Fluidity of the Components of Political Philosophy

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Professor of Philosophy Department, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Various schools of political philosophy seek to answer fundamental questions concerning the nature of government, the ideal forms of political systems, the qualifications of rulers, governmental structures, the criteria of legitimacy, popular acceptance, and efficiency, as well as people’s expectations of governments and the nature of the relationship between the state and society. In fact, the type of answers given to these questions is deeply dependent on the worldview, philosophical anthropology, and political philosophy from which thinkers draw their assumptions. This study examines the nature of these questions and their answers from the perspective of socially constructed perceptions (iʿtibārāt). Social constructs encompass all socially established principles, ideas, structures, and laws created by human beings on the basis of their needs; they do not exist prior to those needs. The theory of social constructs demonstrates that rational responses to the aforementioned political questions are increasingly shaped by variables such as time, place, culture, traditions, customs, social classes, collective mentalities, and people’s needs and expectations. Since these variables are fluid and subject to historical and geographical change, the central questions of political philosophy do not admit fixed and immutable answers. Rather, in accordance with the changing nature of social constructs, the answers themselves undergo fluctuation and transformation. Nevertheless, it is possible, based on historical experience, to identify certain relatively stable principles, such as the centrality of knowledge, virtue, efficiency and skill, public satisfaction and acceptance, justice, freedom, law, welfare and security, ethical life, and similar values, which appear across theories of political philosophy, even though their concrete manifestations may differ.

Graphical Abstract

Social Constructs and the Fluidity of the Components of Political Philosophy

Keywords

Main Subjects


Al-Farabi, A. (1991). On the Opinions of the People of the Virtuous City, Edited by A. Nasri Nader. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq, (in Persian).
Alizadeh, A; Azhdari-Zadeh, H; & Kafi, M. (2009). Sociology of Knowledge, Research Institute of Hawza and University, 3rd ed, (in Persian).
Arendt, H. (1968). Totalitarianism: Pert Three of the Origins of Totalitarianism, San Diego, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Press.
Aristotle. (1991). The Politics of Aristotle, Translation by Benjamin Jowett, Oxford University Press, and Edition: Revised Edition (reprinted).
Bentham, J. (1973). Political Thought, cited by C. wayper, London, the English University Press.
Jones, W. T. (1997). The Masters of Political Thought, Translated by A. Ramin, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing Institute, (in Persian).
Locke, J. (2012). Two Treatises of Government, Translated by H. Azdanlou, Tehran: Ney Publishing, 3rd ed, (in Persian).
Miller, D. (2009). Political Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction, Translated by K. Pouladi, Tehran: Markaz Publishing, (in Persian).
Montesquieu, C. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws, (A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller, & H. S. Stone, Trans.), Cambridge University Press.
Plato. (1995). The Republic. Translated by F. Rouhani. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Publications. (in Persian).
Popper, K. (1962). The Open Society and Its enemies, 2 vol, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul Press.
Rawls, J. (2009). Justice as Fairness, Translated by E. Sabeti, Tehran: Ghoghnoos Publications, (in Persian).
Tabataba’i, S. M. H. (1993). The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism, Tehran: Sadra Publications, 7th ed, (in Persian).
Tabataba’i, S. M. H. (1994). Nihāyat al-Ḥikmah (The Final Philosophy), translated and commented by A. Shirvani, Vol. 3, Qom: Office for Islamic Propagation Publications Center, (in Persian).
CAPTCHA Image