Genius Loci: from an atmospherological point of view

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Professor of Aesthetics, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy

10.22034/jpiut.2026.21214

Abstract

The theoretical vagueness of a concept such as genius loci (spirit of the place) makes often feel unsatisfied. To avoid the widespread more rhetorical trend to attributing a spirit to every place - a trend already discernible in the progressive secularisation from the Greek world (an uncanny daimon) to the Roman world (a familiar genius) – and/or to explaining it as the outcome of creative human planning (especially architectural-urban), my paper states that a place has its specific genius only if it radiates a specific and particularly intense-authoritative atmosphere. That is, when the place is pervaded by a quasi-objective feeling that affects the perceiver and finds in their felt (or lived) body its precise sounding board. Just as there are different types of atmospheres (prototypic, derivative, spurious) and atmospheric encounters, there are therefore different types of genius loci, also depending on one's conception of space, here always understood as lived space, i.e. qualitative-anisotropic, and not in a physical-geometric (isotropic) sense. Contrary to the today’s prevailing projectivist-constructionist explanation (culturalist as well as neuroscientific) and the tendency to explain every affective quality inherent in the external world as a subjective projection, i.e. according to an hydraulic model following the Platonic “invention” of the soul, a “pathic aesthetics” based on a neo-phenomenological approach means with genius loci, in the authentic and original sense of the term, a lifewordly qualitative-emotional experience: in brief a spatialised atmospheric feeling that can sometimes be protected, maybe also improved but never arbitrarily created.

Keywords


Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language. New York: Oxford.

Arbib, M., Griffero, T. (2023). Atmosphere(s) for Architects: Between Phenomenology and Cognition. Manhattan (Kansas): New Prairie Press.

Augoyard, J.-F. (2016). L'apparaître des ambiances. In Rémy, N., Tixier, N. (eds.), Ambiances, tomorrow. International Ambiances Network-University of Thessaly, 579-585.

Böhme, G. (2001). Aisthetik: Vorlesungen über Ästhetik als allgemeine Wahr­nehmungslehre. München: Fink.
Böhme, G. (2017a). The Aesthetics of Atmospheres. London-New York: Routledge.
Böhme, G. (2017b). Atmospheric Architectures. The Aesthetics of Felt Spaces. London: Bloomsbury.

Brönnle, S. (2009). Geomantie als Brücke zwischen den geistigen Ebenen von Mensch und Ort. In Mallien, L., Heimrath, J. (Hg.), Genius Loci. Der Geist von Orten und Landschaften in Geomantie und Architektur. Klein Jasedow: Frachen Verlag, 51-60.

Casey, E. S. (1993) Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-world. Bloomington, Indiana UP.

Cresswell, T. (2013). Place. A short introduction. Hoboken (N. J): Wiley. des Experiments. Dresden and Leipzig: Steinkopf.

Dewey, J. (1931). Philosophy and Civilization. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.

Führ, E.  (1998). ‘Genius loci’. Phänomen oder Phantom? Wolkenkuckucksheim, 3, 2.

Garnham, H. L. (1985). Maintaining the Spirit of Place. A Process for the Preservation of Town Character. Mesa (Arizona): PDA Pub. Co.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lon­don: Routledge.
Grassi, E, (1979). Die Macht der Phantasie. Zur Geschichte abendländischen Denkens. Königstein/Ts.: Athenäum. 

Griffero, T. (2014a) Atmospheres and Lived Space. Studia Phaenomenologica 14, 2014, 29-51.

Griffero, T. (2014b). Atmospheres. Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces. London-New York: Routledge.

Griffero, T. (2017). Quasi-Things. The Paradigm of Atmopsheres. Albany (N.Y.): Suny.

Griffero, T. (2019). Is There Such a Thing as an “Atmospheric Turn”? Instead of an Introduction. In Griffero, T., Tedeschini, M. (eds.), Atmosphere and Aesthetics. A Plural Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 11-62

Griffero, T. (2020a). Places, Affordances, Atmospheres. A Pathic Aesthetics. London-New York: Routledge.
Griffero, T. (2021). The Atmospheric “We”. Moods and Collective Feelings. Sesto S. Giovanni (Mi): Mimesis International.
Griffero, T. (2022). They Are There to Be Perceived: Affordances and Atmospheres. In Djebbara, Z. (ed.), Affordances in Everyday Life. Cham: Springer, 85–95.

Griffero, T. (2024a). Being a Lived Body. From a Neo-phenomenological Point of View. London-New York: Routledge.

Griffero, T. (2024b). Urbilder, Abbilder oder sogar Phantome? Ludwig Klages und die Atmosphären. In Großheim, M., Smiljanić, D. (Hg.), Ludwig Klages und die Neue Phänomenologie. Baden-Baden: Alber Verlag, 179-225.

Günzel, S. (2014). Vom Raum zum Ort – und zurück. In Schlitte, A. et al. (Hg.), Philosophie des Ortes: Reflexionen zum Spatial Turn in den Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften. Bielefeld: transcript. 2014, 25-43.
Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper.
Hiss, T. (1990). The Experience of Place. New York: Knopf.
Klages, L. (1929-1932). Der Geist als Widersacher der Seele. Leipzig: Barth.
Klages, L. (1940). Einführung. In Schüler, A., Fragmente und Vorträge aus dem Nachlass: Leipzig: Barth, 1-119.
Klages, L. (1944). Rhythmen und Runen. Leipzig: Barth.
Klages, L. (1991). Sämtliche Werke. III. Philosophische Schriften. Bonn: Bouvier.
Klages. L. (1942). Ursprünge der Seelenforschung. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Kozljanič, R. J. (2004). Der Geist eines Ortes. Kulturgeschichte und Phänomenologie des Genius Loci, 2 voll. München: Albunea Verlag.
Kozljanič, R. J. (2010-2011). Landschaft als physiognomisch-atmosphärisches und geistig-kulturelles Phänomen. In Hasse, J., Kozlianič, R. J. (Hg.), Jahrbuch für Lebensphilosophie (Gelebter, erfahrener und erinnerter Raum), V, 158-176.
Kuhlmann, D. (1998). Der Geist des (W)ortes. Wolkenkuckucksheim 3, 2.
Lévinas, E. (1976). Difficult liberté. Essais sur le judaïsme. Paris: Albin Michel.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of The City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Malpas, J. (2004). Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Metzger, W. (1941). Psychologie. Die Entwicklung ihrer Grundannahmen seit der Einführung
Müller, H.-J. (2009). Genius Loci und Genialogie. Der Genius Loci und sein anthropologischer Bezug für eine neue Praxis der Gestaltung von Identität. In Mallien, L., Heimrath, J. (Hg.), Genius Loci. Der Geist von Orten und Landschaften in Geomantie und Architektur. Klein Jasedow: Frachen Verlag, 114-147.
Neddens, M. N. (1986). Ökologisch orientierte Stadt- und Raumentwicklung: Genius loci, Leitbilder, Systemansatz, Planung. Eine integrierte Gesamtdarstellung. Wiesbaden-Berlin: Bauverlag.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci. Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin. Architecture and the Senses. New York: Wiley.
Pallasmaa, J. (2014). Space, Place and Atmosphere. Emotion and Peripherical Perception in Architectural Experience. Lebenswelt 4, 230-245.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion, London.
Schmitz, H. (1969). System der Philosophie, 3.2, Der Gefühlsraum. Bonn: Bouvier.
Schmitz, H. (1992). Leib und Gefühl. Materialien zu einer philosophischen Therapeutik. Paderborn: Junfermann.
Schmitz, H. (2011). Der Leib. Berlin-Boston: de Gruyter.
Schmitz, H. (2023). Atmospheres. Sesto S. Giovanni (Mi): Mimesis International.
Shirazi, M. (2008). “Genius loci”, Phenomenology from Without. Wolkenkuckucksheim 12, 2.
Steele, F. (1981). Sense of place. Boston: CBI Pub. Co.
Thibaud, J.-P. (2015). En quête d’ambiances. Gèneve: MetisPresses.
Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. London: Arnold.
Valena, T. (2009). Zu einer Phänomenologie des Genius Loci. In Mallien, L., Heimrath, J. (Hg.), Genius Loci. Der Geist von Orten und Landschaften in Geomantie und Architektur. Klein Jasedow: Frachen Verlag, 148-206.
Watsuji, T. (1961). Climate and Culture: A Philosophical Study. Westport: Greenwood Press.
CAPTCHA Image