Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

        The question of technology, due to inability of a branch of knowledge to answer our contemporary important questions, is one of the interdisciplinary studies that was introduced since the second half of the 20th century to see the human world from a critical viewpoint. The issue appeared first in philosophy of technology as the issue of the relation between philosophy and technology. Martin Heidegger, the most important feature of contemporary philosophy distinguishes the philosophical deliberation on technology from others, and considers technology philosophically. There are two approaches to technology: positive and negative, i.e., technology as a key factor for achieving to a utopia or as a tool leading us dystopia. Heidegger goes to the basis and roots of this relationship and considers it from an ontological viewpoint.
        First of all, since what appears in the phenomenology of technology becomes apparent to us in the light of causality, and since God, according to this idea, can be reduced to a mere cause, there is no room for God as the cause of causes. Secondly, according to common sense, technology is a mere tool which its development will lead us to utopia, but unlike, it seems we are interred to dystopia. Thirdly, the rational theology is in consistent with the technology as a process from which emerges the concept of globalization.

       Technology, Theism, Geshtell, globalization, Heidegger.

Addis, M. (2001), “D. Z. Philip’s Fideism” in Wittgenstein’s Mirror in Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Religion, ed. R. L. Arrington and M. Addis, London: Routledge. -Barrett, C.(ed.), (1966): Ludwig Wittgenstein: Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, Basil Black well, Oxford. -Barrett, C. (1991), Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religious Belief, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. -Macintyre, A. (1983), Against the Self-Images of The Age, London: Duckworth. -O’Grady,Paul,(2004),“Wittgenstein and Relativism” in International Journal of Philosophical Studies,Vol. 12 (3), PP.315-337. - Phillips, 1981, The concept of prayer, Oxford University. -Phillips, D. Z. (1970), Faith and Philosophical Enquiry, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. -Phillips, D. Z. (1989), Faith after Foundation, London: Routledge. -Phillips, D. Z. (1993), Wittgenstein and Religion, London: Macmillan Press. -Putnam, H. (1992), Renaming Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Pres. -Rhees, Rush, (1984), Ludwig Wittgenstein, Personal Recollections, Oxford: Oxford University Press. -Williams, B. (1972), Morality: An Introduction to Ethics, Cambridge University Press. -Winch, Peter, (1964), “Understanding A Primitive Society” in The American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. I. -Winch, Peter, (1988), The Idea of a Social Science, London: Routledge. -Wittgenstein, (1997), On Certainty, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. Von Wright, trans. Peter Winch, Oxford: Blackwell.
وسبیت در تلقّیهای دیىی ییتگىشتایه 97
-Wittgenstein, (1999), Philosophical Investigations, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. Von Wright, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe Oxford: Blackwell. - بٔ ىِٛ ،ْ ٛ٘س ،ٔٗ 1382 دس ٚیت ٍٙتبی ٚ تجیٝ ف٘غ ثٝ »ٗ ؿشح احٛا ٚ آسای ٚیت ٍٙتبی « ،
چ ،ٓ تٟشا :ٖ ٞش غٔ.
CAPTCHA Image