Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate of Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Tabriz, Tabriz

Abstract

In the field of philosophy of religion, the issue of the existence of world after death and the doctrine of rewards and punishments in the hereafter is one of the important and confusing issues as persuades theologians and philosophers of religion to present various and contradictory views about it. Meanwhile, despite David Hume's considerable reputation as one of the most important philosophical critics of religion, the secular irreligious significance of this philosopher's views, especially on the issue of induction and probable reasoning, has not attracted the attention and energy of Hume's researchers in recent decades. The main objectives of this paper, on the basis of methodical research, are to identify the relevance of induction and probable reasoning to the problem of belief in a future state and to the doctrine of rewards and punishments of human acts in philosophy of religion, and to show that the goal of Hume's critical analysis of the credibility and practical significance of religious inductive arguments, by providing an account of the foundation of probable reasoning, is to reject the principal aims of defenders of Christian orthodoxy. It was orthodoxy defender’s aim to show, on the basis of our experience of this world, that there is a future state of rewards and punishments, and that prudence requires that we guide our conduct in this life with a view to our expectations of happiness or misery in the next. We will show that Hume provides a naturalistic account of the psychological mechanisms for the foundations of probable reasoning that generate our beliefs concerning the future, and this account serves to explain why religious arguments concerning the doctrine of a future state inevitably fail to persuade us or influence our conduct, so the doctrine of state of rewards and punishments is of little or no practical consequence for human.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Beattie, James. (1983). An Essay on the Nature and Immutability of Truth. Edinburgh, 1770. Reprint, New York: Garland.
Broad, C. D. (1930). Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Routledge.
Butler, Joseph. (1849). The Works. Edited by S. Halifax. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, David. (1967). A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh, edited by E. C. Mossner and J. V. Price. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hume, David. (1967). A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd rev. ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hume, David. (1967). An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature, reprinted in T.
Hume, David. )2000(. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, edited by T. L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hume, David. (1932). The Letters of David Hume, 2 Vols, edited by J. Y. T. Greig. Oxford: Clarendon Press: LET, 1: 24–25, No. 6.
Huxley, T. H. (1894). Hume: with Helps to the Study of Berkeley. London: Macmillan.
Kemp Smith, Norman. (1947). Introduction to Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson.
Leland, John. (1978). A View of the Principal Deistical Writers. 3 Vols. London, 1757. Reprint, New York: Garland.
Lucretius. (1951). On the Nature of the Universe. Translated by R. E. Latham. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin. (References are to page numbers.)
Mossner, Ernest C. (1978). The Religion of David Hume. Journal of the History of Ideas, 39: 653–663.
Mossner, Ernest C. (1980). The Life of David Hume. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Noonan, Harold. (1999). Hume on Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Penelhum, Terence. (1985). Butler. London: Routledge.
Penelhum, Terence. (1975). Hume. London: MacMillan.
Stephen, Leslie. (1962). History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century. 2 Vols. 3rd ed. (1902) London: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Tindal, Matthew. (1978). Christianity as old as Creation: or, the Gospel, a Republication of the Religion of Nature. London, 1730. Reprint, New York: Garland.
CAPTCHA Image