Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

PhD of Educational Philosophy, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Discussions about the Gadamer-Habermas debate continue in philosophy. But in philosophy of education, Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics is usually accused of conservatism by the defenders of critical pedagogy, and there are few studies in defense of the critical power of Gadamer's hermeneutics. In Iran, official education reform documents emphasize both guarding and reconstructing tradition, but in practice, this balance seems ambiguous. Through re-reading Gadamer's hermeneutics, this paper analyzes the critical elements of tradition. In this way, it provides a defense of education based on philosophical hermeneutics and a model for confronting traditions in education. The central claim of this study is that Gadamer's understanding of tradition has both a descriptive expression as an educational basis and a normative expression as an educational principle. The ground for the realization of both is learning through negativity. In this context, historically effected consciousness, considering tradition as an answer to a question, critical distanciation from tradition, and application of tradition will be the most important critical elements that distinguish Gadamer's hermeneutics from conservative and traditionalist hermeneutics.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Adler, M. J. (1982). The Paideia proposal. New York: Macmillan.
Bagheri Noaparast, Khosrow. (2008). Philosophy of education in Islamic republic of Iran (Vol. 2). Tehran: Elmi-Farhangi. (In Persian).
Chenari, Mahin. (2006). Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutic perspective and its implications in education. PhD Dissertation of Philosophy of Education, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
David Halpin, Alex Moore, Gwyn Edwards, Rosalyn George & Catherine Jones. (2000). Maintaining, Reconstructing and Creating Tradition in Education, Oxford Review of Education, 26(2): 133-144.
Feher, I. M. (2016). Prejudice and Pre- understanding. in N. Keane & C. Lawn (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics (pp. 280-288). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. M. B. Ramos (Trans.). New York: Continuum.
Gadamer, H. (1972). The Continuity of History and the Existential Moment. Philosophy Today, 16(3): 230-240.
Gadamer, H. (1992). Interview: writing and the living voice, in Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics, D. Misgeld and G. Nicholson (eds), L. Schmidt and M. Reuss (trans.). Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 63–71.
Gadamer, H. (1996). The Enigma of Health. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gadamer, H. (2006). Truth and Method. J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall (Trans. Rev.). New York: Continuum.
Giroux, H. (1985). Critical Pedagogy, Cultural Politics and the Discourse of Experience. Journal of Education, 167(2): 22-41.
Giussani, L. (2019). The Risk of Education. M. Sullivan (Trans.). Montreal: McGill-Queen University Press.
Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of the Social Sciences. S. W. Nicholson and J. A. Stark (trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Helenius, T. (2022). Ricoeur and Gadamer. In T. George & G. Van Der Heiden (Eds.), The Gadamerian Mind (pp. 275-287). New York: Routledge.
Holub, R. C. (2010). Jurgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere. H. Bashiriyeh (Trans.). Tehran: Ney. (in persian)
Hutchins, R. M. (1937). Tradition in Education. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (1915-1955), 23(7): 588-601.
Kant, I. (2001). What is Enlightment? H. Fooldapour (Trans.). Kelk, 22, 48-57. (In Persian).
Leiviska, A. (2015). The relevance of Hans-Georg Gadamer's concept of tradition to the philosophy of education. Educational theory, 65(5): 581-601.
Malpas, J. (2018). Hans-Georg Gadamer, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/gadamer.
Medina, P. M. (1986). Hermeneutical principles for education based on Dewey's and Gadamer's philosophies. Master of Arts thesis in Education. The Ohio State University, Ohio.
Morrow, R., Torres, C. A. (2002). Reading Freire and Habermas; Critical pedagogy and transformative social change. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Peters, M. A., Lankshear, C. (2003). Education and hermeneutics; A Freirean interpretation. In P. McLaren & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Politics of liberation (pp. 173-192). Routledge: London.
Raji, Maliheh.; Bagheri Noaparast, Khosrow.; Iravani, Shahin.; Sabaghian, Zahra. (2011). A new look into philosophy and method of adult education in Freire’s views. Educational Innovations, 43: 113-148. (In Persian).
Ricoeur, P. (2016). Ideology, Ethics and politics. M. Akhgar (Trans.). Terhan: Cheshmeh. (In Persian).
Supreme Council of Education (2011). Theoretical foundations of changing public education in Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Supreme council of education. (In Persian).
Torres, C. A.; Morrow, R. A. (1998). “Paulo Freire, Jürgen Habermas, and critical pedagogy: Implications for comparative education”. Melbourne Studies in Education, 39(2): 1–20.
CAPTCHA Image