Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Vico's Critique of Cartesian Thought as one of the most important beginings of the emergence of historical thinking

Maryam Darbanian; Bijan Abdolkarimi

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 561-576

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.41232.2650

Abstract

As a pioneer of historical thinkers, Vico laid out the origins of his historical thought in his critique of Cartesian mathematicalism. Descartes' effort, is not to attain the truth, ... Read More

Comparative Study of the Theoretical Foundations of the Ash'arites and the Transcendent Wisdom about "Creation Ex nihilo"

Hossein Vahabpour; Seyed Ebrahim Aghazadeh; Tavakkol Kouhi Giglou

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 856-879

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.46975.2904

Abstract

How to create and consequently the creation theory of ex nihilio it has been one of the main challenges between Islamic philosophers and theologians. Numerous interpretations in this ... Read More

The Evolutionary Process in Lamarckism and Darwinism: similarities and differences

Sayyed Mojtaba Hosseini; Alireza Mansouri

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 577-593

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.47295.2927

Abstract

It is a widely held view that the inheritance of acquired characteristics plays an important role in Lamarck's ideas about evolution, and there are some counter-instances against it. ... Read More

Explaining, Analyzing and Measuring a Typical form in the Philosophy of Ibn Sina and Suhrawardi

Hossein Falsafi

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 880-902

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.48315.3004

Abstract

The question of what a form is and whether it is substance or breadth is one of the basic questions in ancient and Islamic philosophies and the answer to it has been one of the most ... Read More

Hegemony of Silence: a Hegelian-Lacanian reading of the relationship between silence and language in Molavi's thought

Ali Hassanzadeh; Mahmoud Sufiani

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 594-609

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.48663.3028

Abstract

In the present article we try to trace back what we call the "hegemony of silence" in some of Molavi's verses and poems. The advocates of the "hegemony of silence" over-value silence ... Read More

Comparative Study of the Concept of God in the Book Uthulujiyya and Rasa`Il Al-Kindi Al-Falsafiyya

Hassan Abbasi Hosseinabadi

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 903-926

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.45405.2788

Abstract

The philosophical God is explained by philosophical concepts and terms such as ‘being, cause’, ‘pure Act’ that in addition to them, in Uthulujiyya have also ... Read More

Subjectivity and Genius as Condition of Possibility and Possibility of Fine Art in Architectonic of System of Kant's philosophy

Hadi Salari; Ali Salmani

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 610-625

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.49089.3060

Abstract

We argue in this paper on art as the fine art in architectonic of system of Kant's philosophy. Here be shown that Kant had unitary image from his architectonic of system of philosophy ... Read More

Angels and the Theology of Salvation in the Bible: The Interpretive approach of Saint Augustine

Ali Moradi; Sahar Kavandi

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 927-951

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.47204.2924

Abstract

Angels play a central role for Augustine in the Bible and, consequently, in the doctrine of salvation. In his works, he seeks to design a structure to explain the ontological position ... Read More

Comparing Martin Heidegger’s and Ali Shariati’s Views of Technology

Seyyed Javad Miri; Hossein Rouhani

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 626-642

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.48484.3018

Abstract

As one of the most prominent thinkers of the twentieth century, Martin Heidegger has made fundamental criticisms of the subjectivism of the modern world. He critically examines the ... Read More

Universal and Particular in Plato's Works

Amir Hossein Saket

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 952-973

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.48161.2995

Abstract

Since early times, Plato’s ideas have been assumed as universal entities as opposed to the particulars. More exact analysis of Plato’s terminology, however, shows the contrary. ... Read More

Alain Badiou and Subtractive Ontology in Kant

zahra namayandegi; Ali Fath taheri

Volume 12, Issue 25 , February 2019, , Pages 231-252

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2019.8009

Abstract

Abstract Undoubtedly, Kant is one of the most effective figures in the history of western philosophy because he created a great evolution in this history by his so-called Copernican ... Read More Abstract Undoubtedly, Kant is one of the most effective figures in the history of western philosophy because he created a great evolution in this history by his so-called Copernican revolution and the interwoven relation of subject and object. As is acknowledged by many scholars, Critique of Pure Reason is one of the most important epistemological works in the new era that has set the boundaries of knowledge and has offered a new and unmatched description of how knowledge is gained by subject. Accordingly, most released commentaries of Kant’s philosophical outlook are epistemological. But Alain Badiou, contemporary French philosopher, contrary to common interpretation, presents an ontological one. He himself offers a kind of ontology named subtractive ontology, and believes that we can recognize it, due to how Kant formulates transcendental subject and object, forms of sensible intuition, and categories of understanding. As a result, he describes the features of Kantian ontology in his works Briefings on Existence and Theoretical Writings. The authors of this article see his claim notable and realizable. So, we will try to introduce the specifications of subtractive ontology and then check Badiou’s claim of Kant’s ontology. Finally, we will explain some reasons to criticize his belief. Key Words: Badiou, Kant, Subtractive Ontology, Transcendental Subject, Transcendental Object Introduction The authors of this article try to read Badiou’s interpretation of Kant’s philosophy. In doing so, first we see two of his most famous books about Kant: Briefings on Existence and Theoretical Writings. In them, he claims that Kant should be read as an ontologist, because of some main notions as subject and object. Then, he tries to compare ontology in Kant with the one he names subtractive ontology and which is based on mathematics. So, we read his book, Being and Event, and review some of Badiou’s important ontological foundations as situation, set theory, void set, presentation, power set etc. in order to study his claim. According to Badiou, the existence of transcendental subject and transcendental object, which he names proto-transcendental subject and proto- transcendental object, proves that we can consider Kant as an ontologist, and therefore an ontological interpretation of him is inevitable. In spite of this claim, Badiou also remember that, because of relational character of subject and object, we essentially describe them as epistemological entities. Finally, we conclude that ontological and epistemological interpretation of Kant seems inseparable. For this reason, we have to pay attention to key role of void in Badiou's ontology, i.e. subtractive ontology, and show its differences with Heidegger's fundamental ontology. Conclusion Ontology in Kant, according to Heidegger, is preceded by epistemology and, according to Badiou, they are implicit in Kant's thought; hence, according to Heidegger, Kant's ontology is complete and more important than epistemology. In contrast, Badiou says that Kant cannot never completely rid himself of epistemological strains. Heidegger even talks about Kant's ability to better understand. He believes that if we consider Kant to be an ontologist, we can understand him better than himself. Badiou believes that by relying more on a number of categories, instead of relying on the connection between the subject and the object, the Kantian can be seen deeper than conventional and epistemological believers. Kant is an ontologist. However, Badiou's insistence on the existence of Kant's ontological dimensions is significant. On the one hand, he himself cannot ignore the great and inevitable role of epistemology in Kant, because the characteristics of the subject and object in his view, moreover, of the form of formation Recognizing the human being from the real world through the certainty and necessity of the past elements, and drawing the focus of past writing theorems. Therefore, the relationship between the whole and the whole subject with the object makes it impossible for each other to exist, because, in Kant's opinion, the subject creates the universe; therefore, the existence of the subject and object serves their epistemological function. Whereas the distinction Kant between Neumann and Phenomenon confines his ontological view to phenomena, while he does not directly associate the existence with such a distinction, he basically dismisses it. Counts On the other hand, the elements of Kant's philosophy, as the ontological foundations, cannot be fully coherent with the definition of a person from the ontology of introspection, because the recognition of concepts such as subject, object, sensory intuition, and categories Understanding their epistemological functions in Kant's view of one and the other, and the reasons for their explanation, namely, the need to respond to the circumstances of Kant's time on the other. Consequently, even if we want to accept the ontology of the discourse in Kant, we must rightly affirm that the ontology of discourse in Kant is on epistemology. References: - Badiou, A. (2006) a. Being and Event, translated by Oliver Feltham, London: Continuum. - Badio, A. (2006) b. Briefings on Existence: A Short Treatise on Transitory Ontology, translated by Norman Madarasz, New York: SUNY Press. - Badiou, A. (2009) Logics of Worlds, translated by Alberto Toscano, London: Continuum. - Badiou, A. (1991) "On a Finally Objectless Subject", in Who Comes after the Subject, translated by B.Fink, 24-32, New York: Routledge. - Badiou, A. (2004) Theoretical Writings, translated by Ray Brassier and Alberto Toscano, New York: Continuum. - Forster, Michael N. (2008) Kant and skepticism, Prinston University Press. - Heidegger, M. (1990) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Forth edition enlarged, translated by Richard Taft, Bloomington: Indian University Press. - Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Kullman, O. (2011) Some Remarks on the Philosophy of Alain Badiou: Mathematics, Ontology, Politics, available in http://cs.swan.ac.uk/~csoliver/ Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Logic and Cognition. - Wolf, R. P. (1963) Kant`s Theory of Mental Activity, A Commentary on the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique…, United States: Harvard University Press.

Comparative and Critical Study of the Concept of Freedom in the thought of Kant and Heidegger

Issa Mousazadeh; Ali Aghaiepour; Mostafa Abedi Jigheh

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 643-657

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.48246.3002

Abstract

In a sense, freedom is one of the most important concepts in the history of philosophy, which plays a fundamental role in the thought of philosophers, but like many other concepts, ... Read More

Scientific Realism and Anti-realism in Quine’s Philosophy

Amir Hajizadeh

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 974-996

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.47950.2970

Abstract

In this essay, we try to address a fundamental issue in the philosophy of science, namely the conflict between realism and antirealism in Quine's philosophy. There seems to be an inner ... Read More

Kundera: action as Novel issue; an Arendtian reading of Kundera's approach to novel history

Aref Danyali

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 658-677

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.49132.3064

Abstract

A main issue in Arendt writings is impossibility of action in modern bureaucratic society. Milan Kundera argued that a novel’s fundamental problem is action. This study discusses ... Read More

Intention beyond Idealism and Realism

Homayoun Dahaqin; Bijan Abdolkarimi; Mohammad Shokri

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 997-1026

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.44129.2750

Abstract

Husserl's departure for the rejecting of the duality (subject and object) inherent in the nature of the Western metaphysical tradition is the transcendental structure of consciousness. ... Read More

Philosophical Systems of Post-Corona from Confrontation Perspectives of Realism, Liberalism and Critical Theory; Condemned Scenarios, Platform and Harriet

Arsalan Ghorbani Sheikhneshin; Hamid Ahmadinejad

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 678-695

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.50567.3139

Abstract

Theories based on philosophical foundations and with the capacities of ontology, epistemology and methodology can be very useful in Futures Study research. Considering this, the aim ... Read More

Underdetermination and Ontic Structural Realism

Saeed Masoumi

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 1027-1051

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.38918.2525

Abstract

One of the most important arguments against scientific realism is underdetermination, so realists should address the argument satisfactorily and give an appropriate response to it. ... Read More

Movement in the Immaterials on Base of Islamic Philosophy

Yahya Normohamadi Najafabadi

Volume 12, Issue 25 , February 2019, , Pages 253-283

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2019.8012

Abstract

Undoubtedly, Kant is one of the most effective figures in the history of western philosophy because he created a great evolution in this history by his so-called Copernican revolution ... Read More Undoubtedly, Kant is one of the most effective figures in the history of western philosophy because he created a great evolution in this history by his so-called Copernican revolution and the interwoven relation of subject and object. As is acknowledged by many scholars, Critique of Pure Reason is one of the most important epistemological works in the new era that has set the boundaries of knowledge and has offered a new and unmatched description of how knowledge is gained by subject. Accordingly, most released commentaries of Kant’s philosophical outlook are epistemological. But Alain Badiou, contemporary French philosopher, contrary to common interpretation, presents an ontological one. He himself offers a kind of ontology named subtractive ontology, and believes that we can recognize it, due to how Kant formulates transcendental subject and object, forms of sensible intuition, and categories of understanding. As a result, he describes the features of Kantian ontology in his works Briefings on Existence and Theoretical Writings. The authors of this article see his claim notable and realizable. So, we will try to introduce the specifications of subtractive ontology and then check Badiou’s claim of Kant’s ontology. Finally, we will explain some reasons to criticize his belief. Key Words: Badiou, Kant, Subtractive Ontology, Transcendental Subject, Transcendental Object Introduction The authors of this article try to read Badiou’s interpretation of Kant’s philosophy. In doing so, first we see two of his most famous books about Kant: Briefings on Existence and Theoretical Writings. In them, he claims that Kant should be read as an ontologist, because of some main notions as subject and object. Then, he tries to compare ontology in Kant with the one he names subtractive ontology and which is based on mathematics. So, we read his book, Being and Event, and review some of Badiou’s important ontological foundations as situation, set theory, void set, presentation, power set etc. in order to study his claim. According to Badiou, the existence of transcendental subject and transcendental object, which he names proto-transcendental subject and proto- transcendental object, proves that we can consider Kant as an ontologist, and therefore an ontological interpretation of him is inevitable. In spite of this claim, Badiou also remember that, because of relational character of subject and object, we essentially describe them as epistemological entities. Finally, we conclude that ontological and epistemological interpretation of Kant seems inseparable. For this reason, we have to pay attention to key role of void in Badiou's ontology, i.e. subtractive ontology, and show its differences with Heidegger's fundamental ontology. Conclusion Ontology in Kant, according to Heidegger, is preceded by epistemology and, according to Badiou, they are implicit in Kant's thought; hence, according to Heidegger, Kant's ontology is complete and more important than epistemology. In contrast, Badiou says that Kant cannot never completely rid himself of epistemological strains. Heidegger even talks about Kant's ability to better understand. He believes that if we consider Kant to be an ontologist, we can understand him better than himself. Badiou believes that by relying more on a number of categories, instead of relying on the connection between the subject and the object, the Kantian can be seen deeper than conventional and epistemological believers. Kant is an ontologist. However, Badiou's insistence on the existence of Kant's ontological dimensions is significant. On the one hand, he himself cannot ignore the great and inevitable role of epistemology in Kant, because the characteristics of the subject and object in his view, moreover, of the form of formation Recognizing the human being from the real world through the certainty and necessity of the past elements, and drawing the focus of past writing theorems. Therefore, the relationship between the whole and the whole subject with the object makes it impossible for each other to exist, because, in Kant's opinion, the subject creates the universe; therefore, the existence of the subject and object serves their epistemological function. Whereas the distinction Kant between Neumann and Phenomenon confines his ontological view to phenomena, while he does not directly associate the existence with such a distinction, he basically dismisses it. Counts On the other hand, the elements of Kant's philosophy, as the ontological foundations, cannot be fully coherent with the definition of a person from the ontology of introspection, because the recognition of concepts such as subject, object, sensory intuition, and categories Understanding their epistemological functions in Kant's view of one and the other, and the reasons for their explanation, namely, the need to respond to the circumstances of Kant's time on the other. Consequently, even if we want to accept the ontology of the discourse in Kant, we must rightly affirm that the ontology of discourse in Kant is on epistemology. References: - Badiou, A. (2006) a. Being and Event, translated by Oliver Feltham, London: Continuum. - Badio, A. (2006) b. Briefings on Existence: A Short Treatise on Transitory Ontology, translated by Norman Madarasz, New York: SUNY Press. - Badiou, A. (2009) Logics of Worlds, translated by Alberto Toscano, London: Continuum. - Badiou, A. (1991) "On a Finally Objectless Subject", in Who Comes after the Subject, translated by B.Fink, 24-32, New York: Routledge. - Badiou, A. (2004) Theoretical Writings, translated by Ray Brassier and Alberto Toscano, New York: Continuum. - Forster, Michael N. (2008) Kant and skepticism, Prinston University Press. - Heidegger, M. (1990) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Forth edition enlarged, translated by Richard Taft, Bloomington: Indian University Press. - Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Kullman, O. (2011) Some Remarks on the Philosophy of Alain Badiou: Mathematics, Ontology, Politics, available in http://cs.swan.ac.uk/~csoliver/ Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Logic and Cognition. - Wolf, R. P. (1963) Kant`s Theory of Mental Activity, A Commentary on the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique…, United States: Harvard University Press.

Investigating the Philosophical Basis of "Design" as a Technological Activity, considering the implicit meanings in the intertextual concept of "Techne"

Seyyed Ali Faregh; Yasaman Hajian Foroushani

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 696-711

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.48107.2990

Abstract

According to "Design" theorists, ambiguity in essence and meaning has posed various challenges to this scientific field, and since a lack of understanding of the functions and philosophical ... Read More

From the Idea of God in Classical Metaphysics to Nietzsche's Alternative Design

Mahmoud Izadpanah; Bijan Abdolkarimi; Reza Davari Ardakani; Babak Abbasi

Volume 15, Issue 37 , December 2021, , Pages 1052-1074

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.48413.3012

Abstract

Nietzsche believed that metaphysicians considered their beliefs to be true and gave their ideas an objective truth. Nietzsche claims that all human values and beliefs, including belief ... Read More

Agamben and Philosophical Archaeology

Hamidreza Mahboubi Arani; Abbas Jamali

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 712-729

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.48852.3055

Abstract

Methodology has a special place for every thinker, and this may be even more prominent in the humanities. This article seeks to examine the philosophical methodology of the contemporary ... Read More

Examining the Role of Practice in the Completion of Theoretical Reason in the Views of the Prophets (Al-Kindi, Farabi and Ibn Sina)

Mohammadaslam Raeisi; Morteza Keshavarz; Mohammadali Akhgar

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 730-743

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.51095.3166

Abstract

In this article, the opinions of peripatetics, such as Al-Kindi, Farabi, and Ibn Sina, are examined under the role of practice in the completion of theoretical reason.the method of ... Read More

Recognition of the Broken Windows Theory in "Dwelling" of Modern City; semiotics and content analysis from "The Sacrifice" by Andrei Tarkovsky

MohammadReza Pourmohammadi; Farhad Barandak

Volume 16, Issue 39 , September 2022, , Pages 744-765

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2022.49260.3069

Abstract

The basic problem of urban man today is to live in an unbalanced and alien world; A world in which many parts are formed outside the sphere of human discretion and action. Since the ... Read More

Untranslatability of Theories with Different Vocabularies

Mahdi Hatef

Volume 12, Issue 25 , February 2019, , Pages 285-305

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2019.8018

Abstract

Abstract The controversial idea of incommensurability in Kuhn’s works was gradually replaced by the translatability thesis, for which two distinct arguments could be formulated. ... Read More Abstract The controversial idea of incommensurability in Kuhn’s works was gradually replaced by the translatability thesis, for which two distinct arguments could be formulated. The first is extracted from his theoretical contextual approach to meaning, and the second form his taxonomic conception of natural kind terms. According to each one, it could be given an untranslatability condition, in terms of which we can talk about untranslatability of theories with different vocabularies. I will formulate these untranslatability conditions in this essay, confessing that accepting these conditions will terribly limit the possibility of translation. On the other hand, the maxims critics of Kuhn suggested for translation involves a potential tension and fail to play the role a reliable maxim plays in a translation. In fact, within various versions of these maxims, there is a potential tension between maximizing rationality and maximizing truth in the original text that makes us suspect to follow them systematically. Keywords: Incommensurability, Untranslatability, Classification of natural kinds, Principle of charity, Principle of humanity 1. Introduction Incommensurability, the most frequent term in debates on Kuhn, was not originally a homogenous term. In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions different meanings were meant by incommensurability, which can be distinguished in three types; epistemological, semantic and perceptual. In next writings, however, he restricted it in semantic type. But even this type was not a stable idea. While incommensurability was originally related to communication failure, it was connected then to untranslatability. In addition while he initially seemed to claim a total incommensurability between two theories with different vocabularies, in 1990s he restricted his claim to local incommensurability. The terms he employed to explain incommensurability was not uniform too; in some cases it is formulated in terms of linguistic stuff like words, meaning and reference, and in other cases in terms of cognitive means like concept and classification. This difference leads to two different account of semantic incommensurability as untranslatability. What I’m concerned in this essay is the conditions for translatability which can be extracted from these two accounts. 2. Discussion The first account is resulted from his contextual approach to meaning; a theory according to which meaning of a term is determined by its mode of application in that theory. Using conceptual role semantic the first condition for untranslatability can be articulated: First condition: two theories are untranslatable if and only if scientific laws and possible inferences in two theories do not correspond. I employ this condition to show that why P. Kitcher’s response (1978) to Kuhn on theories in different sides of chemistry revolution in 19th century does not work. This condition, however, is too strong, respecting which not only revolutionary theories, but also most different theories are impossible to be translated. The second account concentrates on concepts arranged in scientific classifications. This account seeks to exhaust content of a theory by classification, which includes an arrangement of specific categories with interconnected relations. Now the second condition can be introduced: Second condition: two theories are untranslatable if and only if there are cross-classifications between natural kinds in their domain. As Career (2001) indicated this condition is neither necessary nor sufficient. It is not necessary because two conceptual systems may be untranslatable without violating principle of non-overlap in their lexical structure. It is also not sufficient, because the overlap between two taxonomies might be such that it can be amended and turn out to be consistent. This condition is weaker that what Kuhn needs to claim incommensurability between theories. Then I attempt to show that while translation conditions are articulated, Kuhn's account of incommensurability requires more articulation, maxims for translation introduced by Kuhn’s critics, like Putnam (1980) and Davidson (1991) suffer from an essential tension which frustrates their projects. According to Davidson a translation must care a principle called principle of charity. This principle includes two distinct principles; according to first one, i.e. principle of coherence, the translator must maximize logical consistency in speaker’s thought. According to second principle, i.e. principle of correspondence, he must understand the speaker such that he is responding to the very features of the world to which the translator would respond in similar circumstances. By first principle the speaker seems to be almost rational, and by the second the translator attributes to the speaker some of what he considers to be true about the world. 3. Conclusion The principle of charity is result of two concerns; inferential concern and representational concern. Now the question is what should we do when these two maxims diverge; i.e. the inferential concern is in different direction from representational concern? Especially when there is no doubt, regarding pervious theories, that they are partially true. As was said, Kitcher’s question was to give instructions to determine how much Prestley says really. In fact, there is a way to separate items with a reference to the use of a phrase from non-reference items. In his current statement, his focus was on principle, with the aim of separating sentences which are based on the theory of the next. But I think that pursuing this concern will amount to a violation of the principle of solidarity. The principle of Putnam's Guide, by giving priority to the transfer and preservation of our concept of one thing in relation to our perception of it, inevitably makes the scientist's rationale sacrificed for the concept of its vocabulary. Davidson has also deliberately articulated two principles in his formulation of the principle of good faith. References: - Carrier, M. (2001) 'Changing Laws and Shifting Concepts: On the Nature and Impact of Incommensurability' in Boyd, R. Hoyningen-Huene, P. Sankey, H. (2001) Incommensuraibility and related matters, Springer. - Davidson,D. (1991)'Three Varieties of Knowledge', Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 30, pp 153-166. - Kitcher, P. (1978) 'Theories, theorists, and Theoretical Change', The Philosophical Review, Vol. 87, No. 4 (Oct. 1978), pp. 519-547 - Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed. - Putnam, H. (1981) 'Two conceptions of rationality' in Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

The ontology of Finitude in Heidegger and Foucault’s Philosophy

Jamal Ghoreyshi Khorasgani; Ali Karbasizadeh Isfahani; Yousef Shaghool

Volume 15, Issue 34 , May 2021, , Pages 300-326

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2019.31480.2214

Abstract

In this article, we analyze the basic role of finitude in Heidegger and Foucault’s philosophy. We argue that finitude makes possible Heidegger’s concept of being and the ... Read More

Volume 18 (2024)

Volume 17 (2023)

Volume 16 (2022)

Volume 15 (2021)

Volume 14 (2020)

Volume 13 (2019)

Volume 12 (2018)

Volume 11 (2017)

Volume 10 (2016)

Volume 9 (2015)

Volume 8 (2014)

Volume 7 (2013)

Volume 6 (2012)

Volume 5 (2011)

Volume 4 (2010)

Volume 3 (2009)

Volume 2 (2008)

Volume 1 (2007)

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract